Literature DB >> 20425660

Distinctions between orthographic long-term memory and working memory.

Adam Buchwald1, Brenda Rapp.   

Abstract

Research in the cognitive and neural sciences has long posited a distinction between the long-term memory (LTM) storage of information and the short-term buffering of information that is being actively manipulated in working memory (WM). This basic type of distinction has been posited in a variety of domains, including written language production-spelling. In the domain of spelling, the primary source of empirical evidence regarding this distinction has been cognitive neuropsychological studies reporting deficits selectively affecting what the cognitive neuropsychological literature has referred to as the orthographic lexicon (LTM) or the graphemic buffer (WM). Recent papers have reexamined several of the hallmark characteristics of impairment affecting the graphemic buffer, with implications for our understanding of the nature of the orthographic LTM and WM systems. In this paper, we present a detailed case series study of 4 individuals with acquired spelling deficits and report evidence from both error types and factors influencing error rates that support the traditional distinction between these cognitive systems involved in spelling. In addition, we report evidence indicating possible interaction between these systems, which is consistent with a variety of recent findings in research on spelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20425660      PMCID: PMC3145833          DOI: 10.1080/02643291003707332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  40 in total

1.  Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material.

Authors:  J DEESE; R A KAUFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-09

2.  Grapheme-to-lexeme feedback in the spelling system: Evidence from a dysgraphic patient.

Authors:  Michael McCloskey; Paul Macaruso; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Cathy Epstein; Marie-Josephe Tainturier
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The impact of deep dysgraphia on graphemic buffer disorders.

Authors:  L Cipolotti; C M Bird; D W Glasspool; T Shallice
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.881

5.  The categorical distinction of vowel and consonant representations: evidence from dysgraphia.

Authors:  Gabriele Miceli; Rita Capasso; Barbara Benvegnù; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.881

6.  Patterns of dysgraphia and the nonlexical spelling process.

Authors:  R Goodman-Schulman; A Caramazza
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

8.  Phonological spelling.

Authors:  F M Hatfield; K E Patterson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1983-08

9.  Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres.

Authors:  Michal Lavidor; Andrew W Ellis
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: levels of representation in written spelling.

Authors:  B Rapp; A Caramazza
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  13 in total

1.  Underlying cause(s) of letter perseveration errors.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Evaluating Spelling in Glioma Patients Undergoing Awake Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fleur van Ierschot; Roelien Bastiaanse; Gabriele Miceli
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Investigating the mechanisms of written word production: Insights from the written blocked cyclic naming paradigm.

Authors:  Bonnie Breining; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2017-04-12

4.  Temporal stability and representational distinctiveness: key functions of orthographic working memory.

Authors:  Vanessa Costa; Simon Fischer-Baum; Rita Capasso; Gabriele Miceli; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Modality and morphology: what we write may not be what we say.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Simon Fischer-Baum; Michele Miozzo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-29

6.  Neural bases of orthographic long-term memory and working memory in dysgraphia.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Jeremy Purcell; Argye E Hillis; Rita Capasso; Gabriele Miceli
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Statistical analysis in Small-N Designs: using linear mixed-effects modeling for evaluating intervention effectiveness.

Authors:  Robert W Wiley; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.773

8.  The analysis of perseverations in acquired dysgraphia reveals the internal structure of orthographic representations.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Examining the central and peripheral processes of written word production through meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy J Purcell; Peter E Turkeltaub; Guinevere F Eden; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-11

10.  Attention Components and Spelling Accuracy: Which Connections Matter?

Authors:  Lucia Bigozzi; Chiara Malagoli; Chiara Pecini; Sara Pezzica; Claudio Vezzani; Giulia Vettori
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.