| Literature DB >> 11817889 |
Michal Lavidor1, Andrew W Ellis.
Abstract
Previous studies have reported an interaction between visual field (VF) and word length such that word recognition is affected more by length in the left VF (LVF) than in the right VF (RVF). A reanalysis showed that the previously reported effects of length were confounded with orthographic neighborhood size (N). In three experiments we manipulated length and N in lateralized lexical decision tasks. Results showed that length and VF interacted even with N controlled (Experiment 1); that N affected responses to words in the LVF but not the RVF (Experiment 2); and that when length and N were combined, length only affected performance in the LVF for words with few neighbors. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 11817889 DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2583
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Lang ISSN: 0093-934X Impact factor: 2.381