Literature DB >> 20425610

Response assessment challenges in clinical trials of gliomas.

Patrick Y Wen1, Andrew D Norden, Jan Drappatz, Eudocia Quant.   

Abstract

Accurate, reproducible criteria for determining tumor response and progression after therapy are critical for optimal patient care and effective evaluation of novel therapeutic agents. Currently, the most widely used criteria for determining treatment response in gliomas is based on two-dimensional tumor measurements using neuroimaging studies (Macdonald criteria). In recent years, the limitation of these criteria, which only address the contrast-enhancing component of the tumor, have become increasingly apparent. This review discusses challenges that have emerged in assessing response in patients with gliomas and approaches being introduced to address them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20425610     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-009-0078-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  64 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Relative cerebral blood volume values to differentiate high-grade glioma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effect: direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements.

Authors:  L S Hu; L C Baxter; K A Smith; B G Feuerstein; J P Karis; J M Eschbacher; S W Coons; P Nakaji; R F Yeh; J Debbins; J E Heiserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Post-surgical contrast enhancement mimicking residual brain tumour.

Authors:  J G Cairncross; J H Pexman; M P Rathbone
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Postoperative contrast enhancement in patients with brain tumor.

Authors:  J G Cairncross; J H Pexman; M P Rathbone; R F DelMaestro
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Serial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cases of glioma: distinguishing tumor recurrence from postresection injury.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Soonmee Cha; Mary Catherine Mayo; Michael W McDermott; Andrew T Parsa; Susan M Chang; William P Dillon; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Corticosteroid-induced magnetic resonance imaging changes in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

Authors:  C J Watling; D H Lee; D R Macdonald; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  18F-FDG PET of gliomas at delayed intervals: improved distinction between tumor and normal gray matter.

Authors:  Alexander M Spence; Mark Muzi; David A Mankoff; S Finbarr O'Sullivan; Jeanne M Link; Thomas K Lewellen; Barbara Lewellen; Pam Pham; Satoshi Minoshima; Kristin Swanson; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  End point assessment in gliomas: novel treatments limit usefulness of classical Macdonald's Criteria.

Authors:  Martin J van den Bent; Michael A Vogelbaum; Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Advanced MRI of adult brain tumors.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Young
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.806

10.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors:  Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  24 in total

1.  Relevance of T2 signal changes in the assessment of progression of glioblastoma according to the Response Assessment in Neurooncology criteria.

Authors:  Alexander Radbruch; Kira Lutz; Benedikt Wiestler; Philipp Bäumer; Sabine Heiland; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Assessment of intra-observer variability in measurement of high-grade brain tumors.

Authors:  James M Provenzale; Michael C Mancini
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Dynamic imaging response following radiation therapy predicts long-term outcomes for diffuse low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Johan Pallud; Jean-François Llitjos; Frédéric Dhermain; Pascale Varlet; Edouard Dezamis; Bertrand Devaux; Raphaëlle Souillard-Scémama; Nader Sanai; Maria Koziak; Philippe Page; Michel Schlienger; Catherine Daumas-Duport; Jean-François Meder; Catherine Oppenheim; François-Xavier Roux
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Early static (18)F-FET-PET scans have a higher accuracy for glioma grading than the standard 20-40 min scans.

Authors:  Nathalie L Albert; Isabel Winkelmann; Bogdana Suchorska; Vera Wenter; Christine Schmid-Tannwald; Erik Mille; Andrei Todica; Matthias Brendel; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Peter Bartenstein; Christian la Fougère
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Multisite Concordance of DSC-MRI Analysis for Brain Tumors: Results of a National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network Collaborative Project.

Authors:  K M Schmainda; M A Prah; S D Rand; Y Liu; B Logan; M Muzi; S D Rane; X Da; Y-F Yen; J Kalpathy-Cramer; T L Chenevert; B Hoff; B Ross; Y Cao; M P Aryal; B Erickson; P Korfiatis; T Dondlinger; L Bell; L Hu; P E Kinahan; C C Quarles
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  3-Dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 3 Tesla for early response assessment of glioblastoma patients during external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Manickam Muruganandham; Patrick P Clerkin; Brian J Smith; Carryn M Anderson; Ann Morris; Aristides A Capizzano; Vincent Magnotta; Sarah M McGuire; Mark C Smith; John E Bayouth; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Current challenges in designing GBM trials for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Shiao-Pei Weathers; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 8.  Neuroradiological response criteria for high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  K Lutz; A Radbruch; B Wiestler; P Bäumer; W Wick; M Bendszus
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.649

9.  Phase-2 trial of palbociclib in adult patients with recurrent RB1-positive glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jennie W Taylor; Mili Parikh; Joanna J Phillips; C David James; Annette M Molinaro; Nicholas A Butowski; Jennifer L Clarke; Nancy Ann Oberheim-Bush; Susan M Chang; Mitchel S Berger; Michael Prados
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Assessment of Brain Tumor Response: RANO and Its Offspring.

Authors:  Sylvia C Eisele; Patrick Y Wen; Eudocia Q Lee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.