Literature DB >> 24986746

3-Dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 3 Tesla for early response assessment of glioblastoma patients during external beam radiation therapy.

Manickam Muruganandham1, Patrick P Clerkin1, Brian J Smith2, Carryn M Anderson1, Ann Morris1, Aristides A Capizzano3, Vincent Magnotta3, Sarah M McGuire1, Mark C Smith1, John E Bayouth1, John M Buatti4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance (3D-MR) proton spectroscopic imaging for treatment planning and its implications for early response assessment in glioblastoma multiforme. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed glioblastoma had 3D-MR proton spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) along with T2 and T1 gadolinium-enhanced MR images at simulation and at boost treatment planning after 17 to 20 fractions of radiation therapy. All patients received standard radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. Imaging for response assessment consisted of MR scans every 2 months. Progression-free survival was defined by the criteria of MacDonald et al. MRSI images obtained at initial simulation were analyzed for choline/N-acetylaspartate ratios (Cho/NAA) on a voxel-by-voxel basis with abnormal activity defined as Cho/NAA ≥2. These images were compared on anatomically matched MRSI data collected after 3 weeks of RT. Changes in Cho/NAA between pretherapy and third-week RT scans were tested using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests and correlated with progression-free survival, radiation dose and location of recurrence using Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 8.6 months, 50% of patients had experienced progression based on imaging. Patients with a decreased or stable mean or median Cho/NAA values had less risk of progression (P<.01). Patients with an increase in mean or median Cho/NAA values at the third-week RT scan had a significantly greater chance of early progression (P<.01). An increased Cho/NAA at the third-week MRSI scan carried a hazard ratio of 2.72 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-6.71; P=.03). Most patients received the prescription dose of RT to the Cho/NAA ≥2 volume, where recurrence most often occurred.
CONCLUSION: Change in mean and median Cho/NAA detected at 3 weeks was a significant predictor of early progression. The potential impact for risk-adaptive therapy based on early spectroscopic findings is suggested. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24986746      PMCID: PMC4183193          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  23 in total

1.  Radiation necrosis versus glioma recurrence: conventional MR imaging clues to diagnosis.

Authors:  Mark E Mullins; Glenn D Barest; Pamela W Schaefer; Fred H Hochberg; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Michael H Lev
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.

Authors:  D R Macdonald; T L Cascino; S C Schold; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  An automated technique for the quantitative assessment of 3D-MRSI data from patients with glioma.

Authors:  T R McKnight; S M Noworolski; D B Vigneron; S J Nelson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Intraoperative MRI to guide the resection of primary supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme--a quantitative radiological analysis.

Authors:  Jens P Schneider; Christos Trantakis; Matthias Rubach; Thomas Schulz; Juergen Dietrich; Dirk Winkler; Christof Renner; Ralf Schober; Kathrin Geiger; Oana Brosteanu; Claus Zimmer; Thomas Kahn
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-06-11       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Validation and predictive power of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive partitioning analysis classes for malignant glioma patients: a report using RTOG 90-06.

Authors:  C B Scott; C Scarantino; R Urtasun; B Movsas; C U Jones; J R Simpson; A J Fischbach; W J Curran
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Combined modality therapy of operated astrocytomas grade III and IV. Confirmation of the value of postoperative irradiation and lack of potentiation of bleomycin on survival time: a prospective multicenter trial of the Scandinavian Glioblastoma Study Group.

Authors:  K Kristiansen; S Hagen; T Kollevold; A Torvik; I Holme; R Nesbakken; R Hatlevoll; M Lindgren; A Brun; S Lindgren; G Notter; A P Andersen; K Elgen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Influence of location and extent of surgical resection on survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme: results of three consecutive Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials.

Authors:  J R Simpson; J Horton; C Scott; W J Curran; P Rubin; J Fischbach; S Isaacson; M Rotman; S O Asbell; J S Nelson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-05-20       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra.

Authors:  S W Provencher
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Chemoirradiation for glioblastoma multiforme: the national cancer institute experience.

Authors:  Jennifer Ho; John Ondos; Holly Ning; Sharon Smith; Teri Kreisl; Fabio Iwamoto; Joohee Sul; Lyndon Kim; Kate McNeil; Andra Krauze; Uma Shankavaram; Howard A Fine; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Individualized radiotherapy by combining high-end irradiation and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs; Fridtjof Nüsslin; Jan J Wilkens
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  The Role of Standard and Advanced Imaging for the Management of Brain Malignancies From a Radiation Oncology Standpoint.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 3.  Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs.

Authors:  C von Neubeck; A Seidlitz; H H Kitzler; B Beuthien-Baumann; M Krause
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Biological imaging in clinical oncology: radiation therapy based on functional imaging.

Authors:  Yo-Liang Lai; Chun-Yi Wu; K S Clifford Chao
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Chia-Lin Tseng; James M Balter; Feifei Teng; Hemant A Parmar; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Association of early changes in 1H MRSI parameters with survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receiving a multimodality treatment regimen.

Authors:  Sarah J Nelson; Achuta K Kadambi; Ilwoo Park; Yan Li; Jason Crane; Marram Olson; Annette Molinaro; Ritu Roy; Nicholas Butowski; Soonmee Cha; Susan Chang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 7.  Choline metabolism-based molecular diagnosis of cancer: an update.

Authors:  Kristine Glunde; Marie-France Penet; Lu Jiang; Michael A Jacobs; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.225

8.  A comparison of coil combination strategies in 3D multi-channel MRSI reconstruction for patients with brain tumors.

Authors:  Maryam Vareth; Janine Lupo; Peder Larson; Sarah Nelson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Lesion segmentation for MR spectroscopic imaging using the convolution difference method.

Authors:  Andrew A Maudsley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; James M Mountz; Brenda F Kurland; Richard L Wahl; Ella F Jones; Nola M Hylton; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Robert J Nordstrom; Lori Henderson; Karen A Kurdziel; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael A Jacobs; Matthias Holdhoff; Edward Taylor; David A Jaffray; Lawrence H Schwartz; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan; Hannah M Linden; Philippe Lambin; Thomas J Dilling; Daniel L Rubin; Lubomir Hadjiiski; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.