Jennie W Taylor1,2, Mili Parikh1, Joanna J Phillips1,3, C David James4, Annette M Molinaro1,5, Nicholas A Butowski1, Jennifer L Clarke1,2, Nancy Ann Oberheim-Bush1,2, Susan M Chang1, Mitchel S Berger1, Michael Prados6. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Division of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, USA. 4. Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 6. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Michael.Prados@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Alterations in the CDK4/6-RB signaling pathway are common causes of cell cycle dysregulation in many cancers, including glioblastoma. Palbociclib is an oral inhibitor of CDK4/6, which leads to phosphorylation of RB1 and cell-cycle arrest. We conducted a two-arm study evaluating efficacy and tissue pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of palbociclib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included confirmation of RB1 proficiency by IHC; ≤ 3 relapses; KPS ≥ 60; no limit on prior treatments. Arm 1 received palbociclib for 7 days prior to indicated resection followed by adjuvant palbociclib. Arm 2 received palbociclib without resection. Primary objective was PFS6; secondary included toxicity, OS, and ORR. Exploratory aims included biomarker assessment and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effects in surgical patients. RESULTS: Total of 22 patients were enrolled; 6 on Arm 1 and 16 on Arm 2. Trial was stopped early secondary to lack of efficacy, with 95% of evaluable patients progressing within 6 months. Median PFS was 5.14 weeks (range 5 days-142 weeks) and median OS was 15.4 weeks (range 2-274 weeks). Two patients (10%) had related grade ≥ 3 AEs. In Arm 1, 5 patients had tissue concentrations of palbociclib felt to be sufficient for biological effect and paired samples available for RB1 IHC. There were no consistent changes in RB1 expression or cell proliferation in the paired tissue. CONCLUSION: In this trial, despite adequate tissue PK, palbociclib monotherapy was not an effective treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. However, these were heavily pretreated patients and targeting the CDK4/6 pathway may still deserve further exploration.
INTRODUCTION: Alterations in the CDK4/6-RB signaling pathway are common causes of cell cycle dysregulation in many cancers, including glioblastoma. Palbociclib is an oral inhibitor of CDK4/6, which leads to phosphorylation of RB1 and cell-cycle arrest. We conducted a two-arm study evaluating efficacy and tissue pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of palbociclib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included confirmation of RB1 proficiency by IHC; ≤ 3 relapses; KPS ≥ 60; no limit on prior treatments. Arm 1 received palbociclib for 7 days prior to indicated resection followed by adjuvant palbociclib. Arm 2 received palbociclib without resection. Primary objective was PFS6; secondary included toxicity, OS, and ORR. Exploratory aims included biomarker assessment and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effects in surgical patients. RESULTS: Total of 22 patients were enrolled; 6 on Arm 1 and 16 on Arm 2. Trial was stopped early secondary to lack of efficacy, with 95% of evaluable patients progressing within 6 months. Median PFS was 5.14 weeks (range 5 days-142 weeks) and median OS was 15.4 weeks (range 2-274 weeks). Two patients (10%) had related grade ≥ 3 AEs. In Arm 1, 5 patients had tissue concentrations of palbociclib felt to be sufficient for biological effect and paired samples available for RB1 IHC. There were no consistent changes in RB1 expression or cell proliferation in the paired tissue. CONCLUSION: In this trial, despite adequate tissue PK, palbociclib monotherapy was not an effective treatment for recurrent glioblastoma. However, these were heavily pretreated patients and targeting the CDK4/6 pathway may still deserve further exploration.
Authors: Karine Michaud; David A Solomon; Eric Oermann; Jung-Sik Kim; Wei-Zhu Zhong; Michael D Prados; Tomoko Ozawa; C David James; Todd Waldman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Jennifer L Clarke; Michele M Ennis; W K Alfred Yung; Susan M Chang; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Lisa M Deangelis; H Ian Robins; Frank S Lieberman; Howard A Fine; Lauren Abrey; Mark R Gilbert; Minesh Mehta; John G Kuhn; Kenneth D Aldape; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael D Prados Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Patricia Goldhoff; Jennifer Clarke; Ivan Smirnov; Mitchel S Berger; Michael D Prados; C David James; Arie Perry; Joanna J Phillips Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Olivier L Chinot; Wolfgang Wick; Warren Mason; Roger Henriksson; Frank Saran; Ryo Nishikawa; Antoine F Carpentier; Khe Hoang-Xuan; Petr Kavan; Dana Cernea; Alba A Brandes; Magalie Hilton; Lauren Abrey; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mark R Gilbert; James J Dignam; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Deborah T Blumenthal; Michael A Vogelbaum; Howard Colman; Arnab Chakravarti; Stephanie Pugh; Minhee Won; Robert Jeraj; Paul D Brown; Kurt A Jaeckle; David Schiff; Volker W Stieber; David G Brachman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rintaro Hashizume; Ali Zhang; Sabine Mueller; Michael D Prados; Rishi R Lulla; Stewart Goldman; Amanda M Saratsis; Andrew P Mazar; Alexander H Stegh; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Craig Horbinski; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Jann N Sarkaria; Todd Waldman; C David James Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Henry S Friedman; Michael D Prados; Patrick Y Wen; Tom Mikkelsen; David Schiff; Lauren E Abrey; W K Alfred Yung; Nina Paleologos; Martin K Nicholas; Randy Jensen; James Vredenburgh; Jane Huang; Maoxia Zheng; Timothy Cloughesy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Todd W Miller; Nicole A Traphagen; Jing Li; Lionel D Lewis; Beatriz Lopes; Ashok Asthagiri; Johanna Loomba; Jenny De Jong; David Schiff; Sohil H Patel; Benjamin W Purow; Camilo E Fadul Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Chiara Greco; Vincenzo Taresco; Amanda K Pearce; Catherine E Vasey; Stuart Smith; Ruman Rahman; Cameron Alexander; Robert J Cavanagh; Francesca Musumeci; Silvia Schenone Journal: ACS Med Chem Lett Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 4.345