PURPOSE: We studied corticosteroid-induced magnetic resonance (MR) scan changes in patients with recurrent malignant glioma to determine if corticosteroid therapy started concurrently with investigational treatment might yield false-positive responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten symptomatic patients not on corticosteroids when malignant glioma recurred had a baseline MR scan performed before corticosteroid treatment, followed by serial scans at weekly intervals for 1 month while on dexamethasone (16 mg/d). The maximum cross-sectional areas and volumes of the gadolinium-enhancing regions (tumor) and T2-weighted abnormalities (tumor plus edema) were compared quantitatively and qualitatively for each series of scans. RESULTS: Nine of 10 patients (90%) had a measurable reduction in the size of the gadolinium-enhancing region or T2-weighted abnormality with corticosteroid treatment. The maximum cross-sectional area and volume of the gadolinium-enhancing region decreased by at least 25% in three of 10 patients (30%). The maximum cross-sectional area and volume of the T2-weighted abnormality decreased by at least 25% in five of 10 patients (50%). Maximum measurable radiologic improvement was evident within 2 weeks in most patients. MR scans were judged improved by the reporting neuroradiologist in seven of 10 (70%). These subjective visual improvements were also evident within 2 weeks, but generally described as slight or modest. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid-induced MR scan reductions in tumor size may confound the assessment of response of recurrent malignant gliomas to investigational agents. For patients who start corticosteroids for symptom control, investigational treatment should be delayed until a new baseline MR image is established 2 weeks later. Response is then judged by comparing subsequent MR scans with the new corticosteroid-influenced baseline image.
PURPOSE: We studied corticosteroid-induced magnetic resonance (MR) scan changes in patients with recurrent malignant glioma to determine if corticosteroid therapy started concurrently with investigational treatment might yield false-positive responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten symptomatic patients not on corticosteroids when malignant glioma recurred had a baseline MR scan performed before corticosteroid treatment, followed by serial scans at weekly intervals for 1 month while on dexamethasone (16 mg/d). The maximum cross-sectional areas and volumes of the gadolinium-enhancing regions (tumor) and T2-weighted abnormalities (tumor plus edema) were compared quantitatively and qualitatively for each series of scans. RESULTS: Nine of 10 patients (90%) had a measurable reduction in the size of the gadolinium-enhancing region or T2-weighted abnormality with corticosteroid treatment. The maximum cross-sectional area and volume of the gadolinium-enhancing region decreased by at least 25% in three of 10 patients (30%). The maximum cross-sectional area and volume of the T2-weighted abnormality decreased by at least 25% in five of 10 patients (50%). Maximum measurable radiologic improvement was evident within 2 weeks in most patients. MR scans were judged improved by the reporting neuroradiologist in seven of 10 (70%). These subjective visual improvements were also evident within 2 weeks, but generally described as slight or modest. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid-induced MR scan reductions in tumor size may confound the assessment of response of recurrent malignant gliomas to investigational agents. For patients who start corticosteroids for symptom control, investigational treatment should be delayed until a new baseline MR image is established 2 weeks later. Response is then judged by comparing subsequent MR scans with the new corticosteroid-influenced baseline image.
Authors: K Anders; G G Grabenbauer; U Schuchardt; R Fahlbusch; R Fietkau; R Sauer; P Krauseneck Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Maaike J Vos; Johannes Berkhof; Otto S Hoekstra; Ingeborg Bosma; Eefje M Sizoo; Jan J Heimans; Jaap C Reijneveld; Esther Sanchez; Frank J Lagerwaard; Jan Buter; David P Noske; Tjeerd J Postma Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2011-07-14 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson; David A Reardon; Howard A Fine; Lauren Abrey; Karla Ballman; Martin Bendszuz; Jan Buckner; Susan M Chang; Michael D Prados; Whitney B Pope; Alma Gregory Sorensen; Martin van den Bent; Wai-Kwan Alfred Yung Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: R-E Yoo; S H Choi; T M Kim; S-H Lee; C-K Park; S-H Park; I H Kim; T J Yun; J-H Kim; C H Sohn Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Fatima Tensaouti; Jonathan Khalifa; Amélie Lusque; Benjamin Plas; Jean Albert Lotterie; Isabelle Berry; Anne Laprie; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; Vincent Lubrano Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Anne Line Stensjøen; Ole Solheim; Kjell Arne Kvistad; Asta K Håberg; Øyvind Salvesen; Erik Magnus Berntsen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: John H Rossmeisl; Paulo A Garcia; Gregory B Daniel; John Daniel Bourland; Waldemar Debinski; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 1.363
Authors: Joost J C Verhoeff; Olaf van Tellingen; An Claes; Lukas J A Stalpers; Myra E van Linde; Dirk J Richel; William P J Leenders; Wouter R van Furth Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Juliya Kalinina; Jun Ahn; Narra S Devi; Liya Wang; Yuancheng Li; Jeffrey J Olson; Michael Glantz; Thomas Smith; Ella L Kim; Alf Giese; Randy L Jensen; Clark C Chen; Bob S Carter; Hui Mao; Miao He; Erwin G Van Meir Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 12.531