Literature DB >> 8083712

Corticosteroid-induced magnetic resonance imaging changes in patients with recurrent malignant glioma.

C J Watling1, D H Lee, D R Macdonald, J G Cairncross.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied corticosteroid-induced magnetic resonance (MR) scan changes in patients with recurrent malignant glioma to determine if corticosteroid therapy started concurrently with investigational treatment might yield false-positive responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten symptomatic patients not on corticosteroids when malignant glioma recurred had a baseline MR scan performed before corticosteroid treatment, followed by serial scans at weekly intervals for 1 month while on dexamethasone (16 mg/d). The maximum cross-sectional areas and volumes of the gadolinium-enhancing regions (tumor) and T2-weighted abnormalities (tumor plus edema) were compared quantitatively and qualitatively for each series of scans.
RESULTS: Nine of 10 patients (90%) had a measurable reduction in the size of the gadolinium-enhancing region or T2-weighted abnormality with corticosteroid treatment. The maximum cross-sectional area and volume of the gadolinium-enhancing region decreased by at least 25% in three of 10 patients (30%). The maximum cross-sectional area and volume of the T2-weighted abnormality decreased by at least 25% in five of 10 patients (50%). Maximum measurable radiologic improvement was evident within 2 weeks in most patients. MR scans were judged improved by the reporting neuroradiologist in seven of 10 (70%). These subjective visual improvements were also evident within 2 weeks, but generally described as slight or modest.
CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid-induced MR scan reductions in tumor size may confound the assessment of response of recurrent malignant gliomas to investigational agents. For patients who start corticosteroids for symptom control, investigational treatment should be delayed until a new baseline MR image is established 2 weeks later. Response is then judged by comparing subsequent MR scans with the new corticosteroid-influenced baseline image.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8083712     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.9.1886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  32 in total

1.  Accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant ACNU/Ara-C for the treatment of malignant glioma.

Authors:  K Anders; G G Grabenbauer; U Schuchardt; R Fahlbusch; R Fietkau; R Sauer; P Krauseneck
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  MRI and thallium-201 SPECT in the prediction of survival in glioma.

Authors:  Maaike J Vos; Johannes Berkhof; Otto S Hoekstra; Ingeborg Bosma; Eefje M Sizoo; Jan J Heimans; Jaap C Reijneveld; Esther Sanchez; Frank J Lagerwaard; Jan Buter; David P Noske; Tjeerd J Postma
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Low grade gliomas: functional mapping resection strategies, extent of resection, and outcome.

Authors:  M S Berger; R C Rostomily
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Report of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition and FDA clinical trials neuroimaging endpoint workshop (January 30, 2014, Bethesda MD).

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson; David A Reardon; Howard A Fine; Lauren Abrey; Karla Ballman; Martin Bendszuz; Jan Buckner; Susan M Chang; Michael D Prados; Whitney B Pope; Alma Gregory Sorensen; Martin van den Bent; Wai-Kwan Alfred Yung
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Independent Poor Prognostic Factors for True Progression after Radiation Therapy and Concomitant Temozolomide in Patients with Glioblastoma: Subependymal Enhancement and Low ADC Value.

Authors:  R-E Yoo; S H Choi; T M Kim; S-H Lee; C-K Park; S-H Park; I H Kim; T J Yun; J-H Kim; C H Sohn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria, contrast enhancement and perfusion MRI for assessing progression in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Fatima Tensaouti; Jonathan Khalifa; Amélie Lusque; Benjamin Plas; Jean Albert Lotterie; Isabelle Berry; Anne Laprie; Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; Vincent Lubrano
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Growth dynamics of untreated glioblastomas in vivo.

Authors:  Anne Line Stensjøen; Ole Solheim; Kjell Arne Kvistad; Asta K Håberg; Øyvind Salvesen; Erik Magnus Berntsen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  Invited review--neuroimaging response assessment criteria for brain tumors in veterinary patients.

Authors:  John H Rossmeisl; Paulo A Garcia; Gregory B Daniel; John Daniel Bourland; Waldemar Debinski; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 1.363

Review 9.  Concerns about anti-angiogenic treatment in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Joost J C Verhoeff; Olaf van Tellingen; An Claes; Lukas J A Stalpers; Myra E van Linde; Dirk J Richel; William P J Leenders; Wouter R van Furth
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Selective Detection of the D-enantiomer of 2-Hydroxyglutarate in the CSF of Glioma Patients with Mutated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Juliya Kalinina; Jun Ahn; Narra S Devi; Liya Wang; Yuancheng Li; Jeffrey J Olson; Michael Glantz; Thomas Smith; Ella L Kim; Alf Giese; Randy L Jensen; Clark C Chen; Bob S Carter; Hui Mao; Miao He; Erwin G Van Meir
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.