| Literature DB >> 34032772 |
Kyu Hwan Choi1, Jong Ho Lee2, Dong Gyu Lee1.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Although the incidence is lower in men than women, osteoporosis remains a significant health issue in men as it may give rise to severe complications if not managed appropriately. As men and women show different biological and social backgrounds, we retrospectively evaluated the differences in the bone metabolism between men and women using bone biomarkers.Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined in all patients using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and analyzing various bone biomarkers such as carboxyl-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX), osteocalcin (OCT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The CTX/OCT ratio was used to estimate the association between bone absorption and formation.OCT, CTX, and ALP levels were elevated in patients with osteoporosis. Women displayed a higher incidence of osteoporosis and greater reduction in BMD than men. The mean OCT level in men was lower than that in women. Moreover, men showed significantly lower OCT levels than women of aged 65 and under 80 years old. Among patients with osteoporosis, men had a higher ratio of bone markers than women.Levels of biomarkers of bone formation and absorption were increased in the osteoporosis group. However, men showed lower increases in bone formation biomarkers than did women, indicating that the rate of bone formation relative to bone absorption did not increase in men compared with that in women. Therefore, we suggest that men and women have different bone metabolism in old age.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34032772 PMCID: PMC8154389 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026153
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Demographic data and bone biomarkers differences between men and women.
| Total | Males | Females | |||
| Sex | N | 139 | 64 (46.0%) | 75 (54.0%) | |
| Osteoporosis | 79 (56.8%) | 27 (42.2%) | 85 (69.3%) | .002∗ | |
| Age | 72.31 ± 0.71 | 72.53 ± 0.92 | 72.97 ± 1.06 | .315 | |
| BMD (T-score) | |||||
| Femur neck | −2.32 ± 1.23 | −1.80 ± 1.11 | −2.77 ± 1.16 | .000∗ | |
| Total hip | −1.20 ± 1.13 | −0.94 ± 1.05 | −1.41 ± 1.16 | .013∗ | |
| Lumbar | −1.44 ± 1.51 | −1.0 ± 0.64 | −1.82 ± 1.28 | .001∗ | |
| OCT, ng/mL | 15.27 ± 7.41 | 18.31 ± 6.72 | .012∗ | ||
| CTX, ng/mL | Mean ± SD | 0.47 ± 0.24 | 0.46 ± 0.23 | .890 | |
| ALP, IU/L | 98.31 ± 50.94 | 100.39 ± 40.27 | .791 | ||
| Vitamin D (25-D), ng/mL | 19.95 ± 10.74 | 18.80 ± 9.93 | .515 | ||
| Ratio of bone marker | 3.66 ± 2.26 | 2.78 ± 1.73 | .013∗ | ||
Bone biomarker differences according to sex in osteoporosis patients.
| OCT, ng/mL | CTX, ng/mL | ALP, IU/L | Vitamin D (25-D), ng/mL | Ratio of bone marker | |
| Male (N = 27) | 16.36 ± 7.58 | 0.53 ± 0.27 | 117.59 ± 64.35 | 19.85 ± 11.69 | 3.97 ± 2.73 |
| Female (N = 52) | 18.89 ± 5.94 | 0.50 ± 0.25 | 107.64 ± 42.54 | 18.39 ± 10.08 | 2.80 ± 1.66 |
| .106 | .678 | .474 | .566 | .048∗ |
Differences in bone biomarkers between sexes according to age group.
| OCT, ng/mL | CTX, ng/mL | ALP, IU/L | Vitamin D (25-D), ng/mL | Ratio of bone marker | |
| N < 65 | |||||
| Male (N = 9) | 20.34 ± 6.66 | 0.54 ± 0.25 | 93.33 ± 31.81 | 20.80 ± 8.87 | 2.84 ± 1.25 |
| Female (N = 11) | 16.24 ± 6.65 | 0.40 ± 0.22 | 86.18 ± 22.72 | 80.81 ± 9.59 | 2.68 ± 1.47 |
| | .18 | .22 | .56 | .99 | .796 |
| 65 ≤ N < 80 | |||||
| Male (N = 46) | 15.26 ± 7.41 | 0.48 ± 0.24 | 98.31 ± 50.94 | 19.94 ± 10.74 | 3.65 ± 2.25 |
| Female (N = 48) | 18.31 ± 6.71 | 0.46 ± 0.23 | 100.38 ± 40.27 | 18.80 ± 9.92 | 2.78 ± 1.73 |
| | .01∗ | .89 | .79 | .51 | .01∗ |
| N ≥ 80 | |||||
| Male (N = 9) | 13.00 ± 3.97 | 0.74 ± 0.20 | 92.55 ± 42.05 | 22.25 ± 14.98 | 4.32 ± 3.24 |
| Female (N = 16) | 17.69 ± 6.75 | 0.62 ± 0.30 | 116.56 ± 61.08 | 15.79 ± 11.09 | 3.69 ± 1.93 |
| | .07 | .195 | .30 | .23 | .55 |
Figure 1Men of 65 and under 80 years old showed an increased ratio of bone biomarkers compared with women. However, other age groups did not show a statistical difference in bone biomarkers’ ratio between sexes. OCT = osteocalcin, ∗P < .05.