Literature DB >> 19411494

Principles of designing a cohort study in orthopaedics.

Dianne M Bryant1, Kevin Willits, Beate P Hanson.   

Abstract

A well-designed and executed prospective cohort study can provide high-quality evidence in the evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical interventions. In designing a cohort study to evaluate orthopaedic interventions, it is important to recognize the limitations of the design as well as the methodological features that can be incorporated to strengthen the validity of the conclusions. In this article, we discuss the importance of the appropriate selection of participants for a control group, the management of confounders, the selection of outcomes with established measurement properties (reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change), the blinded assessment of outcomes, and the impact of nonparticipants and patients lost to follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19411494     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Private practice outcomes: validated outcomes data collection in private practice.

Authors:  Jack Goldstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Stabilising effect of dynamic interspinous spacers in degenerative low-grade lumbar instability.

Authors:  Johannes Holinka; Petra Krepler; Michael Matzner; Josef G Grohs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Case series and descriptive cohort studies in neurosurgery: the confusion and solution.

Authors:  Ignatius N Esene; Julius Ngu; Mohamed El Zoghby; Ihsan Solaroglu; Anna M Sikod; Ali Kotb; Gilbert Dechambenoit; Hossam El Husseiny
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Challenges in outcome measurement: clinical research perspective.

Authors:  Daniel P O'Connor; Mark R Brinker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Predictors of missed research appointments in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Stéphanie J E Becker; Thierry G Guitton; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

Review 6.  The quality of control groups in nonrandomized studies published in the Journal of Hand Surgery.

Authors:  Shepard P Johnson; Sunitha Malay; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  HUMeral shaft fractures: measuring recovery after operative versus non-operative treatment (HUMMER): a multicenter comparative observational study.

Authors:  Kiran C Mahabier; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Hugo W Bolhuis; P Koen Bos; Maarten Wga Bronkhorst; Milko M M Bruijninckx; Jeroen De Haan; Axel R Deenik; Boudewijn J Dwars; Martin G Eversdijk; J Carel Goslings; Robert Haverlag; Martin J Heetveld; Albert J H Kerver; Karel A Kolkman; Peter A Leenhouts; Sven A G Meylaerts; Ron Onstenk; Martijn Poeze; Rudolf W Poolman; Bas J Punt; W Herbert Roerdink; Gert R Roukema; Jan Bernard Sintenie; Nicolaj M R Soesman; Andras K F Tanka; Edgar J T Ten Holder; Maarten Van der Elst; Frank H W M Van der Heijden; Frits M Van der Linden; Peer Van der Zwaal; Jan P Van Dijk; Hans-Peter W Van Jonbergen; Egbert J M M Verleisdonk; Jos P A M Vroemen; Marco Waleboer; Philippe Wittich; Wietse P Zuidema; Suzanne Polinder; Michael H J Verhofstad; Dennis Den Hartog
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.