| Literature DB >> 20416075 |
Yongping Wen1, Anchun Cheng, Mingshu Wang, Han Ge, Chanjuan Shen, Sitong Liu, Jun Xiang, Renyong Jia, Dekang Zhu, Xiaoyue Chen, Bei Lian, Hua Chang, Yi Zhou.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Duck plague virus (DPV) is the causative agent of Duck Plague (DP) that causes significant morbidity and mortality throughout duck-producing areas of the world. The diagnosis of DP currently relies on the use of live or inactivated whole DPV virion as antigens in ELISA, but it is too laborious and expensive for routine application, and it is still difficult to get purified DPV virion with current technology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20416075 PMCID: PMC2879249 DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-77
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Figure 1. M: Protein Marker; Lane 1. uninduced; Lane 2. The purified protein; Lane 3. The unpurified protein. AIdentifiction of the TK protein by Western Blot. Lane 1: uninduced; lane 2: IPTG induced. The arrows indicate the fusion protein of pET-TK.
Figure 2Serial dilution of antigens.
Figure 4Anti-duck horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody diluted to 1: 2000.
Figure 3Anti-duck horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody diluted to 1: 1000.
Figure 5Anti-duck horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody diluted to 1: 4000.
Figure 6Analytical specificity of the TK-ELISA.
One positive serum sample with gradient dilution to evaluate the sensitivity of the TK-ELISA.
| Dilution | 1:160 | 1:320 | 1:640 | 1:1280 | 1:2560 | 1:5120 | 1:10240 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.432 | 0.984 | 0.975 | 0.542 | 0.401 | 0.107 | 0.111 | |
| + | + | + | + | + | - | - | |
The sera-positive and sera-negative are marked with a plus (+) or a minus (-).
The repeatability of the assay.
| Number of replications | X | SD | C.V(%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||||
| 1.322 | 1.485 | 1.409 | 1.388 | 1.425 | 1.605 | 1.439 | 0.097 | 6.742 | |
| 1.611 | 1.569 | 1.398 | 1.487 | 1.552 | 1.623 | 1.540 | 0.085 | 5.501 | |
| 1.324 | 1.382 | 1.578 | 1.418 | 1.308 | 1.509 | 1.419 | 0.106 | 7.459 | |
The reproducibility of the assay.
| X | SD | C.V(%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | ||||
| 1.401 | 1.609 | 1.535 | 1.515 | 0.105 | 6.959 | |
| 1.602 | 1.498 | 1.487 | 1.529 | 0.063 | 4.150 | |
| 1.384 | 1.332 | 1.517 | 1.411 | 0.095 | 6.762 | |
Figure 7Analytical inhibition of the TK-ELISA.
The coincidence rate among SNT, TK-ELISA and DPV-ELISA for detection of antibodies to DPV.
| SNT | DPV-ELISA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 22 | 5 | 24 | 3 | 27 |
| Negative | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Total | 22 | 8 | 24 | 6 | 30 |
The coincidence rate was calculated by the formula: (no. of samples positive by both method + no. of samples negative by both methods)/total no. samples× 100.
Figure 8The kinetics of antibody production using TK-ELISA and DPV-ELISA.