| Literature DB >> 28407817 |
Ying Wu1,2,3, Yangguang Li1,2,3, Mingshu Wang1,2,3, Kunfeng Sun1,2,3, Renyong Jia1,2,3, Shun Chen1,2,3, Dekang Zhu2,3, Mafeng Liu1,2,3, Qiao Yang1,2,3, Xinxin Zhao1,2,3, Xiaoyue Chen2,3, Anchun Cheng4,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lethal Duck Enteritis Virus (DEV) infection can cause high morbidity and mortality of many species of waterfowl within the order Anseriformes. However, little is known about the function of viral genes including the conserved UL55 gene among alpha herpes virus due to the obstacles in maintenance and manipulation of DEV genome in host cells.Entities:
Keywords: Bacteria artificial chromosome; Chinese virulent strain; Duck enteritis virus; UL55
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28407817 PMCID: PMC5390382 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-017-0748-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Primers used in this paper
| NO. | Primers | Sequence (5’-3’) | Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TKA-HOMO-for | gaattcatgcttgccatcataaccgtattctc | TK left homology arm |
| TKA-HOMO-rev | tctagaataacttcgtataatgtatgctatacgaagttatcacctcgagcttttctttcctgtg | ||
| 2 | TKB-HOMO-for | gcatgcacatagcaacaactgacgcaaaagc | TK right homology arm |
| TKB-HOMO-rev | aagctttcccagaaagctcgcctaggtcctc | ||
| 3 | EGFP-for | tctagatagttattaatagtaatcaattacg | EGFP |
| EGFP-rev | gtcgacatgcagtgaaaaaaatgct | ||
| 4 | sopB-for | attcgttaattgcgcgcgtagg | sopB |
| sopB-rev | gaatattcaggccagttatgct | ||
| 5 | repA-for | catggcggaaacagcggttatc | repA |
| repA-rev | atgtatgagaggcgcattggag | ||
| 6 | TK-for | cgcggatcccactgaatgtcactgc | TK |
| TK-rev | cccaagctttcaattaattgtcatctcggt | ||
| 7 | ΔUL55-KanR-for | gaaaggcggttggaataagaggaacgaggcggtagacgtgaccgacaacagtgtaggctggagctgcttc | KanR gene flanked by homology arms of UL55 |
| ΔUL55-KanR-rev | tttcttatggttttaataaaacgctttattacattgtagtgtaacaagaccatatgaatatcctccttag | ||
| 8 | ΔUL55/ΔUL55R-for | tgcaaattagtgggaggtacg | ΔUL55/ΔUL55R identification product |
| ΔUL55/ΔUL55R-rev | cccaaataccctgttagtagctt | ||
| 9 | ΔUL55R-UL55-for | atggccgacgcgaaggcggt | UL55 fragment with left homology arm of UL55 |
| ΔUL55R-UL55-rev | gaagcagctccagcctacac | ||
| 10 | ΔUL55R-KanR-for |
| UL55 fragment with right homology arm of UL55 |
| ΔUL55R-KanR-rev | tttcttatggttttaataaaacgctttattacattgtagtgtaacaagaccatatgaatatcctccttag |
Italic: Complementary sequence for overlap PCR
Fig. 1Identification of recombinant DEV CHv BAC colonies. a Purification and enrichment of BAC-recombinant virus. A: The 3rd passage of BAC-recombinant DEV after infection. B-I: Purification and enrichment of BAC-recombinant DEV by eight round of fluorescence plaque selection. b Orientation analysis of pBAC-DEV digested b EcoR I. c Real Gel analysis of pBAC-DEV digested by EcoR I. d Identification of pBAC-DEV. Lane 1–14: PCR product of DEV genes in table 2; Lane 15–17: PCR product of inserting exogenous gene EGFP, repA and sopB
Fig. 2Identification of the rescued DEV CHv-BAC-G in DEF cells. a Identification of rescued DEV CHv-BAC-G. repA, sopB, EGFP and US2 were amplified by primers in table 1 and 2 using rescued DEV CHv-BAC-G as template; +:Amplicons of repA, sopB, EGFP and US2 using pBAC-DEV plasmid as template for positive control; -: Amplicons of repA, sopB, EGFP and US2 using DEF cell DNA as template for negative control. b Identification of reconstituted DEV CHv-BAC-G by IFA. Polyclonal rabbit anti-TK IgG was taken as primary antibody for detecting of TK protein. A-D: mock infected- DEF cells; I-L: DEV CHv-BAC-G infected cells; E-H: DEV CHv infected cells
Fig. 3Comparative characterization of DEV CHv-BAC-G and its wild type virus. a-c Growth curves of wild type DEV CHv and reconstitute virus DEV CHv-BAC-G. DEF cells were infected at an MOI of 0.02, the TCID50 titer of infected supernatant, cells and mixture of cells cultures were titrated at the indicated time points. All titrations were carried out in three independent experiments. d Plaque area measurement of DEV CHv and DEV CHv-BAC-G. Means and standard deviations of plaques diameter of each strain were measured with ImageJ software. The Mean of plaque areas of DEV CHv was set at 100%. Standard deviations are shown with the error bar. NS: no significant difference ((t-test, p > 0.05). e, f Transmission electron microscopic examination of purified wild type and reconstitute DEV virions. Red box: The virion structure of each virus was scaled up for observation
Fig. 4Identification of DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55 and its revertant DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55R. a Identification of DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55 and DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55R after two rounds of RED recombination. Lane1, 4: The product of UL55 region before RED recombination; Lane 2: The product of UL55 region after 1st round of recombination for constructing UL55 deletion mutant. Lane 3, 5: The product of UL55 region after 2nd round of recombination for constructing UL55 deletion mutant; Lane 6, 7: Identification of 1st and 2nd round of RED recombination for constructing UL55 deletion revertant DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55R, respectively. b, c Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of rescued recombinant virus DEV CHv-BAC-G, DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55, DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55R. (b)(c) Indicated the orientation and real Gel analysis of rescued recombinant virus digested by EcoR I, respectively. △: The different band. d Identification of UL55 deletion mutant and revertant by IFA, DEV CHv-BAC-G infected DEF cells were detected as parental virus. Rabbit anti-UL55 IgG were used as primary antibody. A-D: DEV CHv-BAC-G infected cells. E-H: DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55 infected cells. I-L: DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55R infected cells
Fig. 5Growth properties of UL55 mutant and its parental virus. a, b Growth curve of the rescued recombinant DEV CHv-BAC-G, DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55 and DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55R. DEF cells were infected at an MOI of 0.02, the TCID50 titer of infected superntant and cells of cultures were titrated at the indicated time points. All titrations were carried out in three independent experiments. c Plauqe area measurement of DEV CHv-BAC-G,DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55 and DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55R. Means and standard deviations of plaques diameter of each strain were measured with ImageJ software. Standard deviations are shown with the error bar. NS: no significant difference ((t-test, p > 0.05)
Fig. 6The effect of UL55 protein on the intracellular distribution of UL26.5 protein. a Intracellular distribution analysis of UL55 and UL26.5 protein in DEV CHv infected cells. A-D: Using anti mouse UL55 IgG as primary antibody for detecting the intracellular distribution of UL55 protein. E-H: Using anti rabbit UL26.5 IgG as primary antibody for detecting the intracellular distribution of UL26.5 protein; I-L: Using anti mouse UL55 IgG and anti-rabbit UL26.5 IgG together as primary antibody for colocalization analysis of UL55 and UL26.5 protein. b Intracellular distribution of UL26.5 protein in the absence of UL55 gene. A-D: Using anti rabbit UL26.5 IgG as primary antibody for distribution analysis of UL26.5 protein in DEV CHv-BAC-G infected cells; E-H: Using anti rabbit UL26.5 IgG as primary antibody for distribution analysis of UL26.5 protein in DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55 infected cells; I-L: Using anti rabbit UL26.5 IgG as primary antibody for distribution analysis of UL26.5 protein in DEV CHv-BAC-GΔUL55R infected cell