Literature DB >> 20414699

Rapid prediction of solvation free energy. 3. Application to the SAMPL2 challenge.

Enrico O Purisima1, Christopher R Corbeil, Traian Sulea.   

Abstract

The SAMPL2 hydration free energy blind prediction challenge consisted of a data set of 41 molecules divided into three subsets: explanatory, obscure and investigatory, where experimental hydration free energies were given for the explanatory, withheld for the obscure, and not known for the investigatory molecules. We employed two solvation models for this challenge, a linear interaction energy (LIE) model based on explicit-water molecular dynamics simulations, and the first-shell hydration (FiSH) continuum model previously calibrated to mimic LIE data. On the 23 compounds from the obscure (blind) dataset, the prospectively submitted LIE and FiSH models provided predictions highly correlated with experimental hydration free energy data, with mean-unsigned-errors of 1.69 and 1.71 kcal/mol, respectively. We investigated several parameters that may affect the performance of these models, namely, the solute flexibility for the LIE explicit-solvent model, the solute partial charging method, and the incorporation of the difference in intramolecular energy between gas and solution phases for both models. We extended this analysis to the various chemical classes that can be formed within the SAMPL2 dataset. Our results strengthen previous findings on the excellent accuracy and transferability of the LIE explicit-solvent approach to predict transfer free energies across a wide spectrum of functional classes. Further, the current results on the SAMPL2 test dataset provide additional support for the FiSH continuum model as a fast yet accurate alternative to the LIE explicit-solvent model. Overall, both the LIE explicit-solvent model and the FiSH continuum solvation model show considerable improvement on the SAMPL2 data set over our previous continuum electrostatics-dispersion solvation model used in the SAMPL1 blind challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20414699     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-010-9341-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  36 in total

Review 1.  Macromolecular electrostatics: continuum models and their growing pains.

Authors:  T Simonson
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Computations of Absolute Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules Using Explicit and Implicit Solvent Model.

Authors:  Devleena Shivakumar; Yuqing Deng; Benoît Roux
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Rapid Prediction of Solvation Free Energy. 1. An Extensive Test of Linear Interaction Energy (LIE).

Authors:  Traian Sulea; Christopher R Corbeil; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 7.  Molecular modeling of hydration in drug design.

Authors:  Ricardo L Mancera
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2007-05

8.  Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Exhaustive search and solvated interaction energy (SIE) for virtual screening and affinity prediction.

Authors:  Traian Sulea; Hervé Hogues; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Predicting hydration free energies of polychlorinated aromatic compounds from the SAMPL-3 data set with FiSH and LIE models.

Authors:  Traian Sulea; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Prediction of hydration free energies for aliphatic and aromatic chloro derivatives using molecular dynamics simulations with the OPLS-AA force field.

Authors:  Oliver Beckstein; Bogdan I Iorga
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Prediction of hydration free energies for the SAMPL4 diverse set of compounds using molecular dynamics simulations with the OPLS-AA force field.

Authors:  Oliver Beckstein; Anaïs Fourrier; Bogdan I Iorga
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Exhaustive docking and solvated interaction energy scoring: lessons learned from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  Hervé Hogues; Traian Sulea; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Detection of tautomer proportions of dimedone in solution: a new approach based on theoretical and FT-IR viewpoint.

Authors:  Sedat Karabulut; Hilmi Namli; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  SAMPL7 blind challenge: quantum-mechanical prediction of partition coefficients and acid dissociation constants for small drug-like molecules.

Authors:  Basak Koca Fındık; Zeynep Pinar Haslak; Evrim Arslan; Viktorya Aviyente
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.686

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.