Literature DB >> 22198519

Exhaustive search and solvated interaction energy (SIE) for virtual screening and affinity prediction.

Traian Sulea1, Hervé Hogues, Enrico O Purisima.   

Abstract

We carried out a prospective evaluation of the utility of the SIE (solvation interaction energy) scoring function for virtual screening and binding affinity prediction. Since experimental structures of the complexes were not provided, this was an exercise in virtual docking as well. We used our exhaustive docking program, Wilma, to provide high-quality poses that were rescored using SIE to provide binding affinity predictions. We also tested the combination of SIE with our latest solvation model, first shell of hydration (FiSH), which captures some of the discrete properties of water within a continuum model. We achieved good enrichment in virtual screening of fragments against trypsin, with an area under the curve of about 0.7 for the receiver operating characteristic curve. Moreover, the early enrichment performance was quite good with 50% of true actives recovered with a 15% false positive rate in a prospective calculation and with a 3% false positive rate in a retrospective application of SIE with FiSH. Binding affinity predictions for both trypsin and host-guest complexes were generally within 2 kcal/mol of the experimental values. However, the rank ordering of affinities differing by 2 kcal/mol or less was not well predicted. On the other hand, it was encouraging that the incorporation of a more sophisticated solvation model into SIE resulted in better discrimination of true binders from binders. This suggests that the inclusion of proper Physics in our models is a fruitful strategy for improving the reliability of our binding affinity predictions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22198519     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9529-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  49 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Philippe Ferrara; Holger Gohlke; Daniel J Price; Gerhard Klebe; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Free energy, entropy, and induced fit in host-guest recognition: calculations with the second-generation mining minima algorithm.

Authors:  Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Small molecule obatoclax (GX15-070) antagonizes MCL-1 and overcomes MCL-1-mediated resistance to apoptosis.

Authors:  Mai Nguyen; Richard C Marcellus; Anne Roulston; Mark Watson; Lucile Serfass; S R Murthy Madiraju; Daniel Goulet; Jean Viallet; Laurent Bélec; Xavier Billot; Stephane Acoca; Enrico Purisima; Adrian Wiegmans; Leonie Cluse; Ricky W Johnstone; Pierre Beauparlant; Gordon C Shore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring protein-ligand binding affinities. 2. Benchmark in the CSAR-2010 scoring exercise.

Authors:  Traian Sulea; Qizhi Cui; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Structure-activity relationship of novel DAPK inhibitors identified by structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Masako Okamoto; Kiyoshi Takayama; Tomoko Shimizu; Ayumu Muroya; Toshio Furuya
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Exploring the size limit of templates for inhibitors of the M2 ion channel of influenza A virus.

Authors:  María D Duque; Chunlong Ma; Eva Torres; Jun Wang; Lieve Naesens; Jordi Juárez-Jiménez; Pelayo Camps; F Javier Luque; William F DeGrado; Robert A Lamb; Lawrence H Pinto; Santiago Vázquez
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Validation and use of the MM-PBSA approach for drug discovery.

Authors:  Bernd Kuhn; Paul Gerber; Tanja Schulz-Gasch; Martin Stahl
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 7.446

10.  CSAR benchmark exercise of 2010: combined evaluation across all submitted scoring functions.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; James B Dunbar; Peter Man-Un Ung; Emilio X Esposito; Chao-Yie Yang; Shaomeng Wang; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.956

View more
  6 in total

1.  Small-molecule inhibitors of the pseudaminic acid biosynthetic pathway: targeting motility as a key bacterial virulence factor.

Authors:  Robert Ménard; Ian C Schoenhofen; Limei Tao; Annie Aubry; Patrice Bouchard; Christopher W Reid; Paule Lachance; Susan M Twine; Kelly M Fulton; Qizhi Cui; Hervé Hogues; Enrico O Purisima; Traian Sulea; Susan M Logan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Exhaustive docking and solvated interaction energy scoring: lessons learned from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  Hervé Hogues; Traian Sulea; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Binding pose and affinity prediction in the 2016 D3R Grand Challenge 2 using the Wilma-SIE method.

Authors:  Hervé Hogues; Traian Sulea; Francis Gaudreault; Christopher R Corbeil; Enrico O Purisima
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  CSAR 2014: A Benchmark Exercise Using Unpublished Data from Pharma.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson; Richard D Smith; Kelly L Damm-Ganamet; Jeanne A Stuckey; Aqeel Ahmed; Maire A Convery; Donald O Somers; Michael Kranz; Patricia A Elkins; Guanglei Cui; Catherine E Peishoff; Millard H Lambert; James B Dunbar
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Blind prediction of HIV integrase binding from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Shuai Liu; Nathan M Lim; Karisa L Wymer; Alexander L Perryman; Stefano Forli; Nanjie Deng; Justin Su; Kim Branson; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Improving Docking Performance Using Negative Image-Based Rescoring.

Authors:  Sami T Kurkinen; Sanna Niinivehmas; Mira Ahinko; Sakari Lätti; Olli T Pentikäinen; Pekka A Postila
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.810

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.