Literature DB >> 20413351

Inhibition of topoisomerase I prevents chromosome breakage at common fragile sites.

Martin F Arlt1, Thomas W Glover.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites are loci that preferentially form gaps and breaks on metaphase chromosomes when DNA synthesis is perturbed, particularly after treatment with the DNA polymerase inhibitor, aphidicolin. We and others have identified several cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair proteins that influence common fragile site stability. However, the initial events underlying fragile site breakage remain poorly understood. We demonstrate here that aphidicolin-induced gaps and breaks at fragile sites are prevented when cells are co-treated with low concentrations of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, camptothecin. This reduction in breakage is accompanied by a reduction in aphidicolin-induced RPA foci, CHK1 and RPA2 phosphorylation, and PCNA monoubiquitination, indicative of reduced levels of single stranded DNA. Furthermore, camptothecin reduces spontaneous fragile site breakage seen in cells lacking ATR, even in the absence of aphidicolin. These data from cultured human cells demonstrate that topoisomerase I activity is required for DNA common fragile site breaks and suggest that polymerase-helicase uncoupling is a key initial event in this process. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20413351      PMCID: PMC2896008          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  76 in total

1.  Conversion of topoisomerase I cleavage complexes on the leading strand of ribosomal DNA into 5'-phosphorylated DNA double-strand breaks by replication runoff.

Authors:  D Strumberg; A A Pilon; M Smith; R Hickey; L Malkas; Y Pommier
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Inhibitors of transcription such as 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole and isoquinoline sulfonamide derivatives (H-8 and H-7) promote dephosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II largest subunit.

Authors:  M F Dubois; V T Nguyen; S Bellier; O Bensaude
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-05-06       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Site-specific recombination mediated by an adenovirus vector expressing the Cre recombinase protein: a molecular switch for control of gene expression.

Authors:  M Anton; F L Graham
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Differential replication of a single, UV-induced lesion in the leading or lagging strand by a human cell extract: fork uncoupling or gap formation.

Authors:  D L Svoboda; J M Vos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  WWOX, a novel WW domain-containing protein mapping to human chromosome 16q23.3-24.1, a region frequently affected in breast cancer.

Authors:  A K Bednarek; K J Laflin; R L Daniel; Q Liao; K A Hawkins; C M Aldaz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Replication stress induces genome-wide copy number changes in human cells that resemble polymorphic and pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Martin F Arlt; Jennifer G Mulle; Valerie M Schaibley; Ryan L Ragland; Sandra G Durkin; Stephen T Warren; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Multicolor FISH mapping of YAC clones in 3p14 and identification of a YAC spanning both FRA3B and the t(3;8) associated with hereditary renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  C M Wilke; S W Guo; B K Hall; F Boldog; R M Gemmill; S C Chandrasekharappa; C L Barcroft; H A Drabkin; T W Glover
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 5.736

8.  The FHIT gene, spanning the chromosome 3p14.2 fragile site and renal carcinoma-associated t(3;8) breakpoint, is abnormal in digestive tract cancers.

Authors:  M Ohta; H Inoue; M G Cotticelli; K Kastury; R Baffa; J Palazzo; Z Siprashvili; M Mori; P McCue; T Druck; C M Croce; K Huebner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  Common fragile sites are characterized by histone hypoacetylation.

Authors:  Yanwen Jiang; Isabelle Lucas; David J Young; Elizabeth M Davis; Theodore Karrison; Joshua S Rest; Michelle M Le Beau
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  20 in total

1.  Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats.

Authors:  Lena M Brueckner; Evgeny Sagulenko; Elisa M Hess; Diana Zheglo; Anne Blumrich; Manfred Schwab; Larissa Savelyeva
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Separation of intra-S checkpoint protein contributions to DNA replication fork protection and genomic stability in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Shivani S Patel; Yingchun Zhou; Dennis A Simpson; Shangbang Rao; Joseph G Ibrahim; Marila Cordeiro-Stone; William K Kaufmann
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors governs common fragile site instability in cancer.

Authors:  Efrat Ozeri-Galai; Michal Tur-Sinai; Assaf C Bester; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 4.  Chromatin changes in the development and pathology of the Fragile X-associated disorders and Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Rachel Lokanga; Dmitry Yudkin; Xiao-Nan Zhao; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-01-05

Review 5.  Mismatch-mediated error prone repair at the immunoglobulin genes.

Authors:  Richard Chahwan; Winfried Edelmann; Matthew D Scharff; Sergio Roa
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 6.529

6.  Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of chromosome fragile sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Wei Song; Margaret Dominska; Patricia W Greenwell; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Fragile sites in cancer: more than meets the eye.

Authors:  Thomas W Glover; Thomas E Wilson; Martin F Arlt
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  The role of fragile sites in sporadic papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Laura W Dillon; Christine E Lehman; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  J Thyroid Res       Date:  2012-06-11

9.  The p14ARF alternate reading frame protein enhances DNA binding of topoisomerase I by interacting with the serine 506-phosphorylated core domain.

Authors:  Keya Bandyopadhyay; Pingchuan Li; Ruth A Gjerset
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chromosome fragile sites in Arabidopsis harbor matrix attachment regions that may be associated with ancestral chromosome rearrangement events.

Authors:  Joelle S dela Paz; Patti E Stronghill; Scott J Douglas; Sandy Saravia; Clare A Hasenkampf; C Daniel Riggs
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.