Literature DB >> 23255133

Separation of intra-S checkpoint protein contributions to DNA replication fork protection and genomic stability in normal human fibroblasts.

Stephanie L Smith-Roe1, Shivani S Patel, Yingchun Zhou, Dennis A Simpson, Shangbang Rao, Joseph G Ibrahim, Marila Cordeiro-Stone, William K Kaufmann.   

Abstract

The ATR-dependent intra-S checkpoint protects DNA replication forks undergoing replication stress. The checkpoint is enforced by ATR-dependent phosphorylation of CHK1, which are mediated by the TIMELESS-TIPIN complex and CLASPIN. Although loss of checkpoint proteins is associated with spontaneous chromosomal instability, few studies have examined the contribution of these proteins to unchallenged DNA metabolism in human cells that have not undergone carcinogenesis or crisis. Furthermore, the TIMELESS-TIPIN complex and CLASPIN may promote replication fork protection independently of CHK1 activation. Normal human fibroblasts (NHF) were depleted of ATR, CHK1, TIMELESS, TIPIN or CLASPIN and chromosomal aberrations, DNA synthesis, activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) and clonogenic survival were evaluated. This work demonstrates in NHF lines from two individuals that ATR and CHK1 promote chromosomal stability by different mechanisms that depletion of CHK1 produces phenotypes that resemble more closely the depletion of TIPIN or CLASPIN than the depletion of ATR, and that TIMELESS has a distinct contribution to suppression of chromosomal instability that is independent of its heterodimeric partner, TIPIN. Therefore, ATR, CHK1, TIMELESS-TIPIN and CLASPIN have functions for preservation of intrinsic chromosomal stability that is separate from their cooperation for activation of the intra-S checkpoint response to experimentally induced replication stress. These data reveal a complex and coordinated program of genome maintenance enforced by proteins known for their intra-S checkpoint function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATR; CHK1; CLASPIN; TIMELESS; TIPIN; chromosomal aberration; genome maintenance; human fibroblast; intra-S checkpoint; replication fork protection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23255133      PMCID: PMC3575462          DOI: 10.4161/cc.23177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  71 in total

1.  Timeless preserves telomere length by promoting efficient DNA replication through human telomeres.

Authors:  Adam R Leman; Jayaraju Dheekollu; Zhong Deng; Seung Woo Lee; Mukund M Das; Paul M Lieberman; Eishi Noguchi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Chk1 promotes replication fork progression by controlling replication initiation.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Mick Woodcock; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C Sjögren; K Nasmyth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  ATR signalling: more than meeting at the fork.

Authors:  Edward A Nam; David Cortez
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 5.  Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability.

Authors:  Alessia Errico; Vincenzo Costanzo
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 8.250

6.  Claspin and Chk1 regulate replication fork stability by different mechanisms.

Authors:  Jennifer Scorah; Clare H McGowan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Claspin inhibition leads to fragile site expression.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Focarelli; Samuela Soza; Linda Mannini; Marianna Paulis; Alessandra Montecucco; Antonio Musio
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 8.  Checkpoint responses to unusual structures formed by DNA repeats.

Authors:  Irina Voineagu; Catherine H Freudenreich; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.784

Review 9.  Chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  Chk1 regulates the density of active replication origins during the vertebrate S phase.

Authors:  Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Eva Petermann; David A F Gillespie; Keith W Caldecott; Dean A Jackson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  9 in total

1.  Is activation of the intra-S checkpoint in human fibroblasts an important factor in protection against UV-induced mutagenesis?

Authors:  Christopher D Sproul; Shangbang Rao; Joseph G Ibrahim; William K Kaufmann; Marila Cordeiro-Stone
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  TIPIN depletion leads to apoptosis in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Céline Baldeyron; Amélie Brisson; Bruno Tesson; Fariba Némati; Stéphane Koundrioukoff; Elie Saliba; Leanne De Koning; Elise Martel; Mengliang Ye; Guillem Rigaill; Didier Meseure; André Nicolas; David Gentien; Didier Decaudin; Michelle Debatisse; Stéphane Depil; Francisco Cruzalegui; Alain Pierré; Sergio Roman-Roman; Gordon C Tucker; Thierry Dubois
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 6.603

3.  mTORC1 and DNA-PKcs as novel molecular determinants of sensitivity to Chk1 inhibition.

Authors:  Andrew J Massey; Peter Stephens; Rebecca Rawlinson; Lauren McGurk; Ruth Plummer; Nicola J Curtin
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Mechanisms of chromosomal instability in melanoma.

Authors:  William K Kaufmann; Craig C Carson; Bernard Omolo; Adam J Filgo; Maria J Sambade; Dennis A Simpson; Janiel M Shields; Joseph G Ibrahim; Nancy E Thomas
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 5.  The fork and the kinase: a DNA replication tale from a CHK1 perspective.

Authors:  Marina A González Besteiro; Vanesa Gottifredi
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.657

6.  Inhibition of Survivin with YM155 Induces Durable Tumor Response in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Amit Mehta; Lisa Zhang; Myriem Boufraqech; Yi Liu-Chittenden; Yaqin Zhang; Dhaval Patel; Sean Davis; Avi Rosenberg; Kris Ylaya; Rachel Aufforth; Zhuyin Li; Min Shen; Electron Kebebew
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 13.801

7.  Identification of novel radiosensitizers in a high-throughput, cell-based screen for DSB repair inhibitors.

Authors:  Alexander G Goglia; Robert Delsite; Antonio N Luz; David Shahbazian; Ahmed F Salem; Ranjini K Sundaram; Jeanne Chiaravalli; Petrus J Hendrikx; Jennifer A Wilshire; Maria Jasin; Harriet M Kluger; J Fraser Glickman; Simon N Powell; Ranjit S Bindra
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 6.009

8.  SWI/SNF complexes are required for full activation of the DNA-damage response.

Authors:  Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Jun Nakamura; Darcy Holley; Paul D Chastain; Gary B Rosson; Dennis A Simpson; John R Ridpath; David G Kaufman; William K Kaufmann; Scott J Bultman
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-01-20

9.  ERK-mediated TIMELESS expression suppresses G2/M arrest in colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Beth K Neilsen; Danielle E Frodyma; Jamie L McCall; Kurt W Fisher; Robert E Lewis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.