Literature DB >> 20408043

Receiving right/wrong feedback: consequences for learning.

Lisa K Fazio1, Barbie J Huelser, Aaron Johnson, Elizabeth J Marsh.   

Abstract

Prior work suggests that receiving feedback that one's response was correct or incorrect (right/wrong feedback) does not help learners, as compared to not receiving any feedback at all (Pashler, Cepeda, Wixted, & Rohrer, 2005). In three experiments we examined the generality of this conclusion. Right/wrong feedback did not aid error correction, regardless of whether participants learned facts embedded in prose (Experiment 1) or translations of foreign vocabulary (Experiment 2). While right/wrong feedback did not improve the overall retention of correct answers (Experiments 1 and 2), it facilitated retention of low-confidence correct answers (Experiment 3). Reviewing the original materials was very useful to learners, but this benefit was similar after receiving either right/wrong feedback or no feedback (Experiments 1 and 2). Overall, right/wrong feedback conveys some information to the learner, but is not nearly as useful as being told the correct answer or having the chance to review the to-be-learned materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20408043      PMCID: PMC4073309          DOI: 10.1080/09658211003652491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  6 in total

1.  The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  When does feedback facilitate learning of words?

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Nicholas J Cepeda; John T Wixted; Doug Rohrer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

4.  Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Jeffrey D Karpicke; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected.

Authors:  B Butterfield; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Surprising feedback improves later memory.

Authors:  Lisa K Fazio; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02
  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.

Authors:  Barbie J Huelser; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  Does test-enhanced learning transfer for triple associates?

Authors:  Steven C Pan; Carol M Wong; Zachary E Potter; Jonathan Mejia; Timothy C Rickard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

3.  Memorial consequences of testing school-aged children.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Lisa K Fazio; Anna E Goswick
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-08-15

4.  Effect of feedback type on enhancing subsequent memory: Interaction with initial correctness and confidence level.

Authors:  Lingwei Wang; Jiongjiong Yang
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2021-09-08

5.  Correcting false memories: Errors must be noticed and replaced.

Authors:  Hillary G Mullet; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

6.  Encoding Deficits Impede Word Learning and Memory in Adults With Developmental Language Disorders.

Authors:  Karla K McGregor; Katherine Gordon; Nichole Eden; Tim Arbisi-Kelm; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Waiting for feedback helps if you want to know the answer: the role of curiosity in the delay-of-feedback benefit.

Authors:  Kellie M Mullaney; Shana K Carpenter; Courtney Grotenhuis; Steven Burianek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

8.  Strengthening concept learning by repeated testing.

Authors:  Carola Wiklund-Hörnqvist; Bert Jonsson; Lars Nyberg
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2013-12-07

9.  The influence of evaluative right/wrong feedback on phonological and semantic processes in word learning.

Authors:  Saloni Krishnan; Elise Sellars; Helena Wood; Dorothy V M Bishop; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Prequestions do not enhance the benefits of retrieval in a STEM classroom.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Shana K Carpenter; Monica H Lamm; Shuhebur Rahman; Patrick I Armstrong; Clark R Coffman
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-10-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.