Literature DB >> 19145015

Surprising feedback improves later memory.

Lisa K Fazio1, Elizabeth J Marsh.   

Abstract

The hypercorrection effect is the finding that high-confidence errors are more likely to be corrected after feedback than are low-confidence errors (Butterfield & Metcalfe, 2001). In two experiments, we explored the idea that the hypercorrection effect results from increased attention to surprising feedback. In Experiment 1, participants were more likely to remember the appearance of the presented feedback when the feedback did not match expectations. In Experiment 2, we replicated this effect using more distinctive sources and also demonstrated the hypercorrection effect in this modified paradigm. Overall, participants better remembered both the surface features and the content of surprising feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19145015      PMCID: PMC4036076          DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  Neural correlates of error detection and correction in a semantic retrieval task.

Authors:  Brady Butterfield; Jennifer A Mangels
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-10

2.  Source memory enhancement for emotional words.

Authors:  S Doerksen; A P Shimamura
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2001-03

3.  Emotion, memory, and attention in the taboo Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Donald G MacKay; Marat V Ahmetzanov
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-01

4.  Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected.

Authors:  B Butterfield; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

  5 in total
  26 in total

1.  Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it.

Authors:  Barbie J Huelser; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Lisa K Fazio; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

3.  Improved memory for error feedback.

Authors:  Liesbet Van der Borght; Nathalie Schouppe; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-10

4.  Delaying feedback by three seconds benefits retention of face-name pairs: the role of active anticipatory processing.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Edward Vul
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

5.  Signed Reward Prediction Errors in the Ventral Striatum Drive Episodic Memory.

Authors:  Cristian B Calderon; Esther De Loof; Kate Ergo; Anna Snoeck; Carsten N Boehler; Tom Verguts
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Updating misconceptions: effects of age and confidence.

Authors:  Andrée-Ann Cyr; Nicole D Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-06

7.  Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: is successful retrieval required?

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Henry L Roediger; Emily Rosenzweig
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

8.  Correcting false memories.

Authors:  Lisa K Fazio; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-05-11

9.  Dissociable effects of surprising rewards on learning and memory.

Authors:  Nina Rouhani; Kenneth A Norman; Yael Niv
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The hypercorrection effect in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Teal S Eich; Yaakov Stern; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.