Literature DB >> 24876942

Managing complications I: leaks, strictures, emptying, reflux, chylothorax.

Ke-Neng Chen1.   

Abstract

Esophagectomy can be used to treat several esophageal diseases; it is most commonly used for treatment of esophageal cancer. Esophagectomy is a major procedure that may result in various complications. This article reviews only the important complications resulting from esophageal resection, which are anastomotic complications after esophageal reconstruction (leakage and stricture), delayed emptying or dumping syndrome, reflux, and chylothorax.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; chylothorax; leaks; reflux; strictures emptying

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876942      PMCID: PMC4037422          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.03.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  24 in total

1.  Chylothorax complicating esophagectomy for cancer: a plea for early thoracic duct ligation.

Authors:  S Merigliano; D Molena; A Ruol; G Zaninotto; M Cagol; S Scappin; E Ancona
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Etilefrine use in the management of post-operative chyle leaks in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Philippe Guillem; Ioannis Papachristos; Christophe Peillon; Jean-Pierre Triboulet
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-03

4.  Follow-up of gastric vagotomy alone in the treatment of peptic ulcer.

Authors:  L R DRAGSTEDT; E H CAMP
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1948-10       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Total three-stage oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus.

Authors:  K C McKeown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Postesophagectomy chylothorax: incidence, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Rachit D Shah; James D Luketich; Matthew J Schuchert; Neil A Christie; Arjun Pennathur; Rodney J Landreneau; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Postoperative chylothorax.

Authors:  R J Cerfolio; M S Allen; C Deschamps; V F Trastek; P C Pairolero
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 8.  Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  T Lerut; W Coosemans; G Decker; P De Leyn; P Nafteux; D van Raemdonck
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.588

9.  Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  Shanda H Blackmon; Arlene M Correa; Bob Wynn; Wayne L Hofstetter; Linda W Martin; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Steven G Swisher; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth; Ara A Vaporciyan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Diagnosis and localization of laceration of the thoracic duct: usefulness of lymphangiography and CT.

Authors:  P B Sachs; M G Zelch; T W Rice; M A Geisinger; B Risius; G K Lammert
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  21 in total

1.  Does pyloric drainage have a role in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy?

Authors:  Tamar Nobel; Kay See Tan; Arianna Barbetta; Prasad Adusumilli; Manjit Bains; Matthew Bott; David Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Medical management of patients after bariatric surgery: Principles and guidelines.

Authors:  Abd Elrazek Mohammad Ali Abd Elrazek; Abduh Elsayed Mohamed Elbanna; Shymaa E Bilasy
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-11-27

3.  A utility-based design for randomized comparative trials with ordinal outcomes and prognostic subgroups.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray; Ying Yuan; Peter F Thall; Joan H Elizondo; Wayne L Hofstetter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Radical Surgery for T1 Superficial Esophageal Cell Carcinoma: a Subgroup Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Xinyu Liu; Hai-Ying Guan; Qi Zhu; Chaotao Tang; Fei Cheng; Chunyan Zeng; Youxiang Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2022-02-22

Review 5.  [Management of delayed complications after esophagectomy].

Authors:  A Beham; S Dango; B M Ghadimi
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  [Management of perioperative complications following tumor resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  F Benedix; S F Dalicho; B Garlipp; H Ptok; J Arend; C Bruns
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Pre-operative percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement does not increase post-operative complications or mortality in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  M Zeeshan Siddique; Shafqat Mehmood; Muhammad Ismail; Ammara Yasmeen; Muhammad Abu Bakar; Shahid Khattak; Aamir Ali Syed; M Aasim Yusuf
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-06

8.  An extraordinary rare anastomotic band causing food bolus obstruction following uneventful minimally invasive esophagectomy: endoscopic treatment.

Authors:  Efstratia Baili; Spyridon Davakis; Athanasios Syllaios; Maria Boura; Antonia Meropouli; Alexandros Charalabopoulos
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-27

9.  Does Radiation Dose to Gastric Fundus during Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma Have an Impact on Postoperative Anastomotic Leak?

Authors:  Nikhila Radhakrishna; Shyama Prem Sudha; Raja Kalayarasan; Prasanth Penumadu
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2021-03-17

10.  Successful management of therapy-refractory pseudoachalasia after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy by bypassing colonic pull-up: A case report.

Authors:  Sven Flemming; Johan F Lock; Mohammed Hankir; Stanislaus Reimer; Bernhard Petritsch; Christoph-Thomas Germer; Florian Seyfried
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.