Literature DB >> 23835733

Hybrid trans-thoracic esophagectomy with side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.

Marco E Allaix1, Fernando A Herbella, Marco G Patti.   

Abstract

Esophagectomy is the primary treatment modality for non-metastatic esophageal cancer. A trans-thoracic approach is used in most centers in the United States. Anastomotic complications, such as leakage and stricture, are associated with worse short-term and long-term outcomes. Recent data suggest that a side-to-side mechanical intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is associated with a reduced rate of anastomotic leaks and strictures. This article describes the technique of trans-thoracic hybrid esophagectomy with side-to-side intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23835733     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-013-2281-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  26 in total

1.  Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak--a retrospective study of predisposing factors.

Authors:  P K Patil; S G Patel; R C Mistry; R K Deshpande; P B Desai
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Roger H Kim; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Intrathoracic linear stapled esophagogastric anastomosis: an alternative to the end to end anastomosis.

Authors:  Lyall A Gorenstein; Marc Bessler; Joshua R Sonett
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Sina Ercan; Thomas W Rice; Sudish C Murthy; Lisa A Rybicki; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  W T Vigneswaran; V F Trastek; P C Pairolero; C Deschamps; R C Daly; M S Allen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  Shanda H Blackmon; Arlene M Correa; Bob Wynn; Wayne L Hofstetter; Linda W Martin; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Steven G Swisher; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth; Ara A Vaporciyan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: A follow-up analysis of another decade.

Authors:  Warren J Gasper; David V Glidden; Chengshi Jin; Lawrence W Way; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kamal Nagpal; Kamran Ahmed; Amit Vats; Danny Yakoub; David James; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Krishna Moorthy; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  Esophageal Achalasia: Evaluation and Treatment of Recurrent Symptoms.

Authors:  Marco G Patti; Francisco Schlottmann; Fernando A M Herbella
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 2.  Prevention of Perioperative Anastomotic Healing Complications: Anastomotic Stricture and Anastomotic Leak.

Authors:  Kristina L Guyton; Neil H Hyman; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2016-06-29

3.  A new technology for reducing anastomotic fistula in the neck after esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ya-Nan Song; Yu Qi; Chun-Yang Zhang; Yin-Liang Sheng; Kai Wu; Sen-Lin Zhu; Lu Han; Ting-Ting Shan; Guan-Chao Ye; Qing-Yi Zhang; Yan-Li Chen; Jin-Wei Chen; Ya-Fei Liu; Lu-Bing Gao; Yang Yang; Zhan-Feng He; Deng-Yan Zhu; Dong-Lei Liu; Feng-Biao Wen; Tian-Liang Zheng; Ji-Lun Li; Song Zhao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Prevalence of anastomotic leak and the impact of indocyanine green fluorescein imaging for evaluating blood flow in the gastric conduit following esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Masaki Ohi; Yuji Toiyama; Yasuhiko Mohri; Susumu Saigusa; Takashi Ichikawa; Tadanobu Shimura; Hiromi Yasuda; Yoshiki Okita; Shigeyuki Yoshiyama; Minako Kobayashi; Toshimitsu Araki; Yasuhiro Inoue; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.230

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.