Literature DB >> 20401330

An in vitro evaluation of cone-beam breast CT methods.

Kai Zeng1, Laurie L Fajardo, Simon Kao, Edmund A Franken, Jeong Mi Park, Zhenxue Jing, Er-Wei Bai, Ge Wang.   

Abstract

Tomosynthesis was developed for mammography, especially breast cancer detection. However, its limited-angular range scan and resultant data incompleteness causes strong image artifacts and distortions. To address this problem, a hybrid imaging method was proposed in our previous work, which combines tomosynthesis and low-resolution CT into a single system to produce fewer artifacts and distortions at a similar dose level. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the images reconstructed using the proposed method as compared with that using the conventional tomosynthesis method (ML-convex). For that purpose, the projection datasets are acquired in both numerical simulation and phantom experiments on our breast imaging platform. Three kinds of phantoms are used in our work, including a numerical phantom, a physical phantom and 8 in vitro phantoms made of breast specimens. In addition to visual comparison of the reconstructed images, we employ spatial resolution, image contrast, reconstruction error, and convergence rate to evaluate the results quantitatively. It is observed that the results from our method can achieve significantly higher spatial resolution, higher contrast, smaller reconstruction error and faster convergence rate. Besides, a reader study using 8 in vitro phantoms of breast specimens demonstrates the clinical potential of our method, which significantly outperforms the conventional tomosynthesis.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 20401330      PMCID: PMC2855164     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol        ISSN: 0895-3996            Impact factor:   1.535


  16 in total

Review 1.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Comparison of MR imaging sequences for liver and head and neck interventions: is there a single optimal sequence for all purposes?

Authors:  Daniel T Boll; Jonathan S Lewin; Jeffrey L Duerk; Andrik J Aschoff; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 3.  Digital mammography.

Authors:  John M Lewin; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Richard H Moore; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Digital tomosynthesis aided by low-resolution exact computed tomography.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Hengyong Yu; Shiying Zhao; Laurie Lee Fajardo; Christopher Ruth; Zhenxue Jing; Ge Wang
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Globally convergent algorithms for maximum a posteriori transmission tomography.

Authors:  K Lange; J A Fessler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 10.856

7.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and x-ray photography.

Authors:  R Gordon; R Bender; G T Herman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography.

Authors:  K Lange; R Carson
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A I Mushlin; R W Kouides; D E Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dose reduction with adaptive bolus chasing computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Zhijun Cai; Er-Wei Bai; Ge Wang; Melhem J Sharafuddin; Hicham T Abada
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.535

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.