Literature DB >> 20400522

A four-kallikrein panel predicts prostate cancer in men with recent screening: data from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Rotterdam.

Andrew J Vickers1, Angel M Cronin, Monique J Roobol, Caroline J Savage, Mari Peltola, Kim Pettersson, Peter T Scardino, Fritz H Schröder, Hans Lilja.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have developed a statistical prediction model for prostate cancer based on four kallikrein markers in blood: total, free, and intact prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and kallikrein-related peptidase 2 (hK2). Although this model accurately predicts the result of biopsy in unscreened men, its properties for men with a history of PSA screening have not been fully characterized. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A total of 1,501 previously screened men with elevated PSA underwent initial biopsy during rounds 2 and 3 of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Rotterdam, with 388 cancers diagnosed. Biomarker levels were measured in serum samples taken before biopsy. The prediction model developed on the unscreened cohort was then applied and predictions compared with biopsy outcome.
RESULTS: The previously developed four-kallikrein prediction model had much higher predictive accuracy than PSA and age alone (area under the curve of 0.711 versus 0.585, and 0.713 versus 0.557 with and without digital rectal exam, respectively; both P < 0.001). Similar statistically significant enhancements were seen for high-grade cancer. Applying the model with a cutoff of 20% cancer risk as the criterion for biopsy would reduce the biopsy rate by 362 for every 1,000 men with elevated PSA. Although diagnosis would be delayed for 47 cancers, these would be predominately low-stage and low-grade (83% Gleason 6 T(1c)).
CONCLUSIONS: A panel of four kallikreins can help predict the result of initial biopsy in previously screened men with elevated PSA. Use of a statistical model based on the panel would substantially decrease rates of unnecessary biopsy. (c) 2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20400522      PMCID: PMC2891337          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  25 in total

1.  Differential exoprotease activities confer tumor-specific serum peptidome patterns.

Authors:  Josep Villanueva; David R Shaffer; John Philip; Carlos A Chaparro; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Adam B Olshen; Martin Fleisher; Hans Lilja; Edi Brogi; Jeff Boyd; Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Eric C Holland; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Howard I Scher; Paul Tempst
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Intact free prostate-specific antigen and free and total human glandular kallikrein 2. Elimination of assay interference by enzymatic digestion of antibodies to F(ab')2 fragments.

Authors:  Ville Väisänen; Mari T Peltola; Hans Lilja; Martti Nurmi; Kim Pettersson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome.

Authors:  Ina L Deras; Sheila M J Aubin; Amy Blase; John R Day; Seongjoon Koo; Alan W Partin; William J Ellis; Leonard S Marks; Yves Fradet; Harry Rittenhouse; Jack Groskopf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Prostate specific antigen isoforms and human glandular kallikrein 2--which offers the best screening performance in a predominantly black population?

Authors:  B J Martin; C D Cheli; K Sterling; M Ward; S Pollard; D Lifsey; D Mercante; L Martin; W Rayford
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; E David Crawford; Robert L Grubb; Saundra S Buys; David Chia; Timothy R Church; Mona N Fouad; Edward P Gelmann; Paul A Kvale; Douglas J Reding; Joel L Weissfeld; Lance A Yokochi; Barbara O'Brien; Jonathan D Clapp; Joshua M Rathmell; Thomas L Riley; Richard B Hayes; Barnett S Kramer; Grant Izmirlian; Anthony B Miller; Paul F Pinsky; Philip C Prorok; John K Gohagan; Christine D Berg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Long-term prediction of prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity is predictive but does not improve the predictive accuracy of a single PSA measurement 15 years or more before cancer diagnosis in a large, representative, unscreened population.

Authors:  David Ulmert; Angel M Serio; Matthew F O'Brien; Charlotte Becker; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Thomas Björk; Göran Berglund; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Relationship of prostate-specific antigen velocity to histologic findings in a prostate cancer screening program.

Authors:  Scott E Eggener; Ofer Yossepowitch; Kimberly A Roehl; Stacy Loeb; Xiaoying Yu; William J Catalona
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  The predictive value of prostate cancer biomarkers depends on age and time to diagnosis: towards a biologically-based screening strategy.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; David Ulmert; Angel M Serio; Thomas Björk; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Göran Berglund; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  49 in total

1.  Transatlantic Consensus Group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hashim U Ahmed; Oguz Akin; Jonathan A Coleman; Sarah Crane; Mark Emberton; Larry Goldenberg; Hedvig Hricak; Mike W Kattan; John Kurhanewicz; Caroline M Moore; Chris Parker; Thomas J Polascik; Peter Scardino; Nicholas van As; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Comparison Between the Four-kallikrein Panel and Prostate Health Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Nordström; Andrew Vickers; Melissa Assel; Hans Lilja; Henrik Grönberg; Martin Eklund
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Overdiagnosis and Lives Saved by Reflex Testing Men With Intermediate Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Todd M Morgan; Teresa A'mar; Sarah P Psutka; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  A multiparametric approach to improve upon existing prostate cancer screening and biopsy recommendations.

Authors:  Brian T Helfand; Carly A Conran; Jianfeng Xu; William J Catalona
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  Clinical performance of the 4Kscore Test to predict high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy: A meta-analysis of us and European clinical validation study results.

Authors:  Stephen M Zappala; Peter T Scardino; David Okrongly; Vincent Linder; Yan Dong
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

6.  A Four-kallikrein Panel Predicts High-grade Cancer on Biopsy: Independent Validation in a Community Cohort.

Authors:  Katharina Braun; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hans Lilja; Anders S Bjartell
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Prediction models in cancer care.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  A Four-kallikrein Panel and β-Microseminoprotein in Predicting High-grade Prostate Cancer on Biopsy: An Independent Replication from the Finnish Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Melissa Assel; Liisa Sjöblom; Teemu J Murtola; Kirsi Talala; Paula Kujala; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Kimmo Taari; Anssi Auvinen; Andrew Vickers; Tapio Visakorpi; Teuvo L Tammela; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-11-11

9.  [Epidemiology of prostate cancer].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Properties of the 4-Kallikrein Panel Outside the Diagnostic Gray Zone: Meta-Analysis of Patients with Positive Digital Rectal Examination or Prostate Specific Antigen 10 ng/ml and Above.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Monique J Roobol; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Anders Bjartell; Jonas Hugosson; Jenny L Donovan; Arnauld Villers; Stephen Zappala; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.