Literature DB >> 15708261

Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer: a randomized Phase II study.

Alfonso Dueñas-González1, Lucely Cetina-Perez, Carlos Lopez-Graniel, Aarón Gonzalez-Enciso, Ernesto Gómez-Gonzalez, Lesbia Rivera-Rubi, Gonzalo Montalvo-Esquivel, David Muñoz-Gonzalez, Juan Robles-Flores, Elisa Vazquez-Govea, Jaime de La Garza, Alejandro Mohar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with cisplatin (C) concurrent with radiotherapy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IB2, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma in a preoperative setting. The main endpoints were the pathologic response rate and toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 83 patients were randomized to either C or GC. Treatment consisted of six doses of cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for Arm 1 (C) and six doses of gemcitabine at 125 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for or Arm 2 (GC) Both regimens were administered concurrent with 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy in 2-Gy fractions for 5 weeks. After chemoradiotherapy, patients underwent radical hysterectomy.
RESULTS: All 83 patients were studied for toxicity and 80 for response. The complete pathologic response rate in the C arm and GC arm was 55% (95% confidence interval, 35.5-73%) and 77.5% (95% confidence interval, 57-90%; p = 0.0201). Among those with a partial response, 7 patients each had high and intermediate-high risk factors for recurrence in their surgical specimens in the C arm vs. 2 and 3 patients, respectively, with these characteristics in the CG arm. The number of weekly doses and the dose intensity of GC were lower than for C. The time to complete external beam radiotherapy also favored the C arm. The CG combination produced greater GI and hematologic toxicity.
CONCLUSION: The radiosensitizing combination of GC achieved a greater pathologic response rate than C in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15708261     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  24 in total

1.  Impact of bone marrow radiation dose on acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer: principal component analysis on high dimensional data.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Karen Messer; Brent S Rose; John H Lewis; Steve B Jiang; Catheryn M Yashar; Arno J Mundt; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Utility of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a parallel study of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Feng-Yuan Liu; Chyong-Huey Lai; Lan-Yan Yang; Chun-Chieh Wang; Gigin Lin; Chee-Jen Chang; Wei-Yang Chang; Shu-Hua Huang; Yu-Erh Huang; Nan-Jing Peng; Ji-Hong Hong; Angel Chao; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Yu-Chen Chang; Tzu-Chen Yen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Combination therapy: New treatment paradigm for locally advanced cervical cancer?

Authors:  Peter G Rose
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral 3-aminopyridine-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazone (3-AP, NSC #663249) in the treatment of advanced-stage solid cancers: a California Cancer Consortium Study.

Authors:  Joseph Chao; Timothy W Synold; Robert J Morgan; Charles Kunos; Jeff Longmate; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Dean Lim; Stephen Shibata; Vincent Chung; Ronald G Stoller; Chandra P Belani; David R Gandara; Mark McNamara; Barbara J Gitlitz; Derick H Lau; Suresh S Ramalingam; Angela Davies; Igor Espinoza-Delgado; Edward M Newman; Yun Yen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 5.  Pharmacotherapy options for locally advanced and advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Alfonso Dueñas-González; Lucely Cetina; Jaime Coronel; Déborah Martínez-Baños
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Brent S Rose; Bulent Aydogan; Yun Liang; Mete Yeginer; Michael D Hasselle; Virag Dandekar; Rounak Bafana; Catheryn M Yashar; Arno J Mundt; John C Roeske; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Alvarado-Miranda; Oscar Arrieta; Carlos Gamboa-Vignolle; David Saavedra-Perez; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Enrique Bargallo-Rocha; Juan Zinser-Sierra; Victor Perez-Sanchez; Teresa Ramirez-Ugalde; Fernando Lara-Medina
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin concurrent with pelvic irradiation for primary therapy of cervical cancer: report of the first seven cases in Thai women.

Authors:  Bandit Chumworathayi; Pissamai Yuenyao; Vorachai Tangvorapongchai; Sanguanchoke Luanratanakorn; Jeerichuda Pattamadilok; Srichai Krusun
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-11-26

9.  [(18)F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-2-d-glucose versus 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine for defining hematopoietically active pelvic bone marrow in gynecologic patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Wyss; Ruben Carmona; Roshan A Karunamuni; Jakub Pritz; Carl K Hoh; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Therapeutic Mechanisms of Treatment in Cervical and Vaginal Cancer.

Authors:  Charles A Kunos
Journal:  Oncol Hematol Rev       Date:  2012
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.