Literature DB >> 27556422

Dosimetric predictors of acute haematological toxicity in oesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Jie Lee1,2, Jhen-Bin Lin3, Fang-Ju Sun4,5, Kuo-Wei Lu1, Chou-Hsien Lee6, Yu-Jen Chen1,2, Wen-Chien Huang7, Hung-Chang Liu7, Meng-Hao Wu1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Haematological toxicity (HT) is common in patients with oesophageal cancer (EC) treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic guidelines provide no dose constraints for the bone marrow (BM) to avoid HT. We aimed to determine dosimetric factors associated with HT during CRT for EC.
METHODS: 41 patients with EC treated with neoadjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil-based CRT were retrospectively reviewed. Associations between the dose-volume histogram parameters of thoracic bones and blood cell count changes during CRT were assessed using logistic regression analyses. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to derive optimal dosimetric planning constraints. Vx indicates the total organ volume percentage exceeding a radiation dose of x (Gy).
RESULTS: Greater thoracic vertebrae and rib irradiation doses, including mean vertebral dose (MVD), thoracic vertebrae V5-30 (TVV5-30), mean rib dose and rib V5-20, were associated with increased leukopenia (grade ≥ 3) risk. Additional BM sites (sternum, scapulae and clavicles) did not influence HT. White blood cell and absolute neutrophil count nadirs were associated with increased irradiation doses to the thoracic vertebrae, ribs and sternum. Chemotherapy cycle number was not significantly associated with severe neutropenia or leukopenia. Cut-off values with the highest likelihood of avoiding leukopenia were MVD < 25.9 Gy, TVV20 < 70% and TVV10 < 77%.
CONCLUSION: Thoracic bone irradiation dose was significantly associated with HT after adjusting for chemotherapy effects. Efforts to maintain MVD < 25.9 Gy, TVV10 < 77% and TVV20 < 70% could reduce HT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first study addressing issues concerning HT in patients with neoadjuvant CRT-treated EC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27556422      PMCID: PMC5124806          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  24 in total

1.  Distribution of proliferating bone marrow in adult cancer patients determined using FLT-PET imaging.

Authors:  James A Hayman; Jason W Callahan; Alan Herschtal; Sarah Everitt; David S Binns; Rod J Hicks; Michael Mac Manus
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Proton radiation therapy offers reduced normal lung and bone marrow exposure for patients receiving dose-escalated radiation therapy for unresectable stage iii non-small-cell lung cancer: a dosimetric study.

Authors:  R Charles Nichols; Soon N Huh; Randal H Henderson; Nancy P Mendenhall; Stella Flampouri; Zuofeng Li; Harry J D'Agostino; J Davis Cury; Dat C Pham; Bradford S Hoppe
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 3.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine.

Authors:  M H Zweig; G Campbell
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal.

Authors:  Jose G Bazan; Gary Luxton; Edward C Mok; Albert C Koong; Daniel T Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin for Stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: JCOG trial (JCOG 9906).

Authors:  Ken Kato; Kei Muro; Keiko Minashi; Atsushi Ohtsu; Satoshi Ishikura; Narikazu Boku; Hiroya Takiuchi; Yoshito Komatsu; Yoshinori Miyata; Haruhiko Fukuda
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Val Gebski; Bryan Burmeister; B Mark Smithers; Kerwyn Foo; John Zalcberg; John Simes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Bone marrow sparing in intensity modulated proton therapy for cervical cancer: Efficacy and robustness under range and setup uncertainties.

Authors:  Eric Dinges; Nicole Felderman; Sarah McGuire; Brandie Gross; Sudershan Bhatia; Sarah Mott; John Buatti; Dongxu Wang
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Loren K Mell; David A Schomas; Joseph K Salama; Kiran Devisetty; Bulent Aydogan; Robert C Miller; Ashesh B Jani; Hedy L Kindler; Arno J Mundt; John C Roeske; Steven J Chmura
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Reduced toxicity with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT): an update on the whole abdominopelvic radiation therapy (WAP-RT) experience.

Authors:  Neil B Desai; Nicholas F Stein; Michael P LaQuaglia; Kaled M Alektiar; Brian H Kushner; Shakeel Modak; Heather M Magnan; Karyn Goodman; Suzanne L Wolden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy as definitive treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Falk Roeder; Nils H Nicolay; Tam Nguyen; Ladan Saleh-Ebrahimi; Vasilis Askoxylakis; Tilman Bostel; Felix Zwicker; Juergen Debus; Carmen Timke; Peter E Huber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  4 in total

1.  Vertebral body irradiation during chemoradiation therapy for esophageal cancer contributes to acute bone marrow toxicity.

Authors:  Andrew Zhang; Matthew P Deek; Sinae Kim; Mutlay Sayan; Alison Grann; Raquel T Wagman; Usha Malhotra; Lara Hathout; Nrusingh Biswal; Yin Zhang; John Langenfeld; Timothy Kennedy; David A August; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-06

2.  Potential of Proton Therapy to Reduce Acute Hematologic Toxicity in Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Samantha Warren; Christopher N Hurt; Thomas Crosby; Mike Partridge; Maria A Hawkins
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Severe radiation-induced lymphopenia during postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy has poor prognosis in patients with stage IIB-III after radical esophagectomy: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wenjie Ni; Zefen Xiao; Zongmei Zhou; Dongfu Chen; Qinfu Feng; Jun Liang; Jima Lv
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Bone marrow dosimetric analysis of lymphopenia in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Qingtao Qiu; Zicheng Zhang; Jing Zhang; Guanghui Yang; Chengxin Liu; Baosheng Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 4.452

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.