Literature DB >> 20399824

Application of food and feed safety assessment principles to evaluate transgenic approaches to gene modulation in crops.

Wayne Parrott1, Bruce Chassy, Jim Ligon, Linda Meyer, Jay Petrick, Junguo Zhou, Rod Herman, Bryan Delaney, Marci Levine.   

Abstract

New crop varieties containing traits such as enhanced nutritional profiles, increased yield, and tolerance to drought are being developed. In some cases, these new traits are dependent on small RNAs or regulatory proteins such as transcription factors (TF) that modify the expression of endogenous plant genes. To date, the food and feed safety of genetically modified (GM) crops has been assessed by the application of a set of internationally accepted procedures for evaluating the safety of GM crops. The goal of this paper is to review the main aspects of the current safety assessment paradigm and to recommend scientifically sound principles for conducting a safety assessment for GM crops that are developed by technologies that modify endogenous plant gene expression. Key considerations for such a safety assessment include the following: (1) RNA and TF are generally recognized as safe (GRAS); (2) Genes encoding RNAi and regulatory proteins such as TFs are an important component of the plantgenome; (3) Crops engineered using RNAi modifications are not expected to produce heterologous proteins; (4) The modulation of TFs may result in quantitative differences in endogenous plant components,which can be assessed through agronomic performance and compositional analysis on a caseby-case basis. 2010 ILSI. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20399824     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  23 in total

Review 1.  Biosafety considerations of RNAi-mediated virus resistance in fruit-tree cultivars and in rootstock.

Authors:  Godwin Nana Yaw Lemgo; Silvia Sabbadini; Tiziana Pandolfini; Bruno Mezzetti
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 2.  EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Jaime Aguilera; Zoltán Diveki; Ana Gomes; Yi Liu; Claudia Paoletti; Patrick du Jardin; Lieve Herman; Joe N Perry; Elisabeth Waigmann
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  Evaluation of genetically engineered crops using transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic profiling techniques.

Authors:  Agnès E Ricroch; Jean B Bergé; Marcel Kuntz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Why we need GMO crops in agriculture.

Authors:  Melvin J Oliver
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

Review 5.  Editor's choice: Crop genome plasticity and its relevance to food and feed safety of genetically engineered breeding stacks.

Authors:  Natalie Weber; Claire Halpin; L Curtis Hannah; Joseph M Jez; John Kough; Wayne Parrott
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Editor's choice: Evaluating the potential for adverse interactions within genetically engineered breeding stacks.

Authors:  Henry-York Steiner; Claire Halpin; Joseph M Jez; John Kough; Wayne Parrott; Lynne Underhill; Natalie Weber; L Curtis Hannah
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  A risk-based approach to the regulation of genetically engineered organisms.

Authors:  Gregory Conko; Drew L Kershen; Henry Miller; Wayne A Parrott
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Comparability of imazapyr-resistant Arabidopsis created by transgenesis and mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jaimie Schnell; Hélène Labbé; Nik Kovinich; Yuzuki Manabe; Brian Miki
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Comparative compositional analysis of transgenic potato resistant to potato tuber moth (PTM) and its non-transformed counterpart.

Authors:  Hassan Rahnama; Amir Bahram Moradi; Seyed Hamid Mirrokni; Foad Moradi; Mohammad Reza Shams; Mohammad Hossein Fotokian
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 10.  The food and environmental safety of Bt crops.

Authors:  Michael S Koch; Jason M Ward; Steven L Levine; James A Baum; John L Vicini; Bruce G Hammond
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.