Literature DB >> 20396669

Incorporating Historical Control Data When Comparing Tumor Incidence Rates.

Shyamal D Peddada, Gregg E Dinse, Grace E Kissling.   

Abstract

Animal carcinogenicity studies, such as those conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), focus on detecting trends in tumor rates across dose groups. Over time, the NTP has compiled vast amounts of data on tumors in control animals. Currently, this information is used informally, without the benefit of statistical tests for carcinogenicity that directly incorporate historical data on control animals. This article proposes a survival-adjusted test for detecting dose-related trends in tumor incidence rates, which incorporates data on historical control rates and formally accounts for variation in these rates among studies. An extensive simulation, based on a wide range of realistic situations, demonstrates that the proposed test performs well in comparison to the current NTP test, which does not incorporate historical control data. In particular, our test can aid in interpreting the occurrence of a few tumors in treated animals that are rarely seen in controls. One such example, which motivates our work, concerns the analysis of histiocytic sarcoma in the NTP's 2-year cancer bioassay of benzophenone. Whereas the occurrence of three histiocytic sarcomas in female rats was not significant according to the current NTP testing procedure (P = 0.074), it was highly significant (P = 0.004) when control data from six recent historical studies were included and our test was applied to the combined data.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 20396669      PMCID: PMC2853781          DOI: 10.1198/016214506000001356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  16 in total

1.  Tests for order restrictions in binary data.

Authors:  S D Peddada; K E Prescott; M Conaway
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Age-adjusted exact trend tests in the event of rare occurrences.

Authors:  Jessica Y Mancuso; Hongshik Ahn; James J Chen; James P Mancuso
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  On the use of historical control data to estimate dose response trends in quantal bioassay.

Authors:  R L Prentice; R T Smythe; D Krewski; M Mason
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The incorporation of historical control information in tests of proportions: simulation study of Tarone's procedure.

Authors:  R N Tamura; S S Young
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Ratio estimates, the delta method, and quantal response tests for increased carcinogenicity.

Authors:  G S Bieler; R L Williams
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Using historical controls in the analysis of developmental toxicity data.

Authors:  L Ryan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Evaluation of historical control data in carcinogenicity studies.

Authors:  H Greim; H P Gelbke; U Reuter; H W Thielmann; L Edler
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies of Gallium Arsenide (CAS No. 1303-00-0) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice (Inhalation Studies).

Authors: 
Journal:  Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser       Date:  2000-09

9.  Data analysis: statistical analysis and use of historical control data.

Authors:  J K Haseman
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.271

10.  A survival-adjusted quantal-response test for analysis of tumor incidence rates in animal carcinogenicity studies.

Authors:  Shyamal D Peddada; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  Bayesian Estimation for Item Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Categorical Indicators.

Authors:  Sierra A Bainter
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Order restricted inference for multivariate binary data with application to toxicology.

Authors:  Ori Davidov; Shyamal Peddada
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Comparing tumor rates in current and historical control groups in rodent cancer bioassays.

Authors:  Gregg E Dinse; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.452

4.  Points to consider on the statistical analysis of rodent cancer bioassay data when incorporating historical control data.

Authors:  Susan A Elmore; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 5.  Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC.

Authors:  Jose V Tarazona; Daniele Court-Marques; Manuela Tiramani; Hermine Reich; Rudolf Pfeil; Frederique Istace; Federica Crivellente
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Developing a synthetic control group using electronic health records: Application to a single-arm lifestyle intervention study.

Authors:  Yi-An Ko; Zhenchao Chen; Chang Liu; Yingtian Hu; Arshed A Quyyumi; Lance A Waller; Melinda Higgins; Thomas R Ziegler; Kenneth L Brigham; Greg S Martin
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-10-04

7.  Linear mixed effects models under inequality constraints with applications.

Authors:  Laura Farnan; Anastasia Ivanova; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.