Literature DB >> 19516052

Points to consider on the statistical analysis of rodent cancer bioassay data when incorporating historical control data.

Susan A Elmore1, Shyamal D Peddada.   

Abstract

Researchers routinely use historical control data (HCD) when analyzing rodent carcinogenicity data obtained in a particular study. Although the concurrent control group is considered to be the most relevant group to compare with the dose groups, the HCD provides a broader perspective to assist in understanding the significance of the current study. The HCD is used to provide information about the incidences of spontaneous tumors and malignant systemic disorders such as lymphoma and leukemia. This article presents some possible ways of incorporating the HCD when analyzing data from a rodent cancer bioassay. Specifically, exploratory (informal) and formal statistical procedures for analyzing such data are reviewed. The boxplot is presented as an exploratory tool that describes the current data in the context of the distribution of the HCD. It will also identify potential outliers that would not be otherwise be flagged using standard methods such as the mean, standard deviation, and range. The various options for the statistical analysis of HCD presented here do not necessarily represent standard practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19516052      PMCID: PMC4041607          DOI: 10.1177/0192623309339606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  11 in total

1.  On the use of historical control data to estimate dose response trends in quantal bioassay.

Authors:  R L Prentice; R T Smythe; D Krewski; M Mason
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Use of historical controls in time-adjusted trend tests for carcinogenicity.

Authors:  J G Ibrahim; L M Ryan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Testing for increased carcinogenicity using a survival-adjusted quantal response test.

Authors:  C J Portier; A J Bailer
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1989-05

4.  A stabilized moment estimator for the beta-binomial distribution.

Authors:  R N Tamura; S S Young
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  The incorporation of historical control information in tests of proportions: simulation study of Tarone's procedure.

Authors:  R N Tamura; S S Young
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Incorporating Historical Control Data When Comparing Tumor Incidence Rates.

Authors:  Shyamal D Peddada; Gregg E Dinse; Grace E Kissling
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Ratio estimates, the delta method, and quantal response tests for increased carcinogenicity.

Authors:  G S Bieler; R L Williams
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The use of historical control information in testing for a trend in Poisson means.

Authors:  R E Tarone
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Carcinogenicity evaluation: comparison of tumor data from dual control groups in the Sprague-Dawley rat.

Authors:  Paul Baldrick
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.902

10.  Trends in mortality, body weights and tumor incidences of Wistar rats over 20 years.

Authors:  R Eiben; E M Bomhard
Journal:  Exp Toxicol Pathol       Date:  1999-11
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Designing phenotyping studies for genetically engineered mice.

Authors:  C J Zeiss; J M Ward; H G Allore
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.221

2.  Comparing tumor rates in current and historical control groups in rodent cancer bioassays.

Authors:  Gregg E Dinse; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.452

3.  Pathology Principles and Practices for Analysis of Animal Models.

Authors:  Sue E Knoblaugh; Tobias M Hohl; Krista M D La Perle
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2018-12-01

Review 4.  Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC.

Authors:  Jose V Tarazona; Daniele Court-Marques; Manuela Tiramani; Hermine Reich; Rudolf Pfeil; Frederique Istace; Federica Crivellente
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 5.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.