Literature DB >> 28715231

Bayesian Estimation for Item Factor Analysis Models with Sparse Categorical Indicators.

Sierra A Bainter1,2.   

Abstract

Psychometric models for item-level data are broadly useful in psychology. A recurring issue for estimating item factor analysis (IFA) models is low-item endorsement (item sparseness), due to limited sample sizes or extreme items such as rare symptoms or behaviors. In this paper, I demonstrate that under conditions characterized by sparseness, currently available estimation methods, including maximum likelihood (ML), are likely to fail to converge or lead to extreme estimates and low empirical power. Bayesian estimation incorporating prior information is a promising alternative to ML estimation for IFA models with item sparseness. In this article, I use a simulation study to demonstrate that Bayesian estimation incorporating general prior information improves parameter estimate stability, overall variability in estimates, and power for IFA models with sparse, categorical indicators. Importantly, the priors proposed here can be generally applied to many research contexts in psychology, and they do not impact results compared to ML when indicators are not sparse. I then apply this method to examine the relationship between suicide ideation and insomnia in a sample of first-year college students. This provides an important alternative for researchers who may need to model items with sparse endorsement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; item factor analysis; sparse categorical indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28715231      PMCID: PMC6062000          DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1342203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  14 in total

1.  A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.

Authors:  L M Collins; J L Schafer; C M Kam
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2001-12

2.  The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies.

Authors:  Scott E Maxwell
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-06

3.  Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis.

Authors:  H W Marsh; K T Hau; J R Balla; D Grayson
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Measurement Model Quality, Sample Size, and Solution Propriety in Confirmatory Factor Models.

Authors:  Phill Gagne; Gregory R Hancock
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with mixed exponential family and ordered categorical data.

Authors:  Sik-Yum Lee; Nian-Sheng Tang
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  R J Wirth; Michael C Edwards
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2007-03

7.  Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.

Authors:  Carlos G Forero; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-09

8.  MODEL IDENTIFICATION AND COMPUTER ALGEBRA.

Authors:  Kenneth A Bollen; Shawn Bauldry
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2010-10-07

9.  Ridge structural equation modelling with correlation matrices for ordinal and continuous data.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Ruilin Wu; Peter M Bentler
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  Defining risk heterogeneity for internalizing symptoms among children of alcoholic parents.

Authors:  Andrea M Hussong; David B Flora; Patrick J Curran; Laurie A Chassin; Robert A Zucker
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2008
View more
  1 in total

1.  Dangers of the Defaults: A Tutorial on the Impact of Default Priors When Using Bayesian SEM With Small Samples.

Authors:  Sanne C Smid; Sonja D Winter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.