Literature DB >> 8211615

Cholecystectomy. Which procedure is best for the high-risk patient?

C M Wittgen1, J P Andrus, C H Andrus, D L Kaminski.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), which results in less postoperative pain, disability, and scarring, has become an attractive alternative method of surgical management of the ambulatory patient with gallbladder disease. The best procedure for severely ill patients who are poor operative risks but require cholecystectomy, however, is unknown since the operative morbidity and mortality of LC in this group of patients had not been studied. All patients (177) undergoing cholecystectomy at one institution were evaluated. Based on their preoperative state of health as defined by a modified acute physiologic score (APS), patients were divided into two groups; one group was defined by an APS of less than 10, indicating they were in good health, and the other had an APS greater than or equal to 10, indicating that the group had multiple risk factors, predicting an increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Selection for either procedure, LC or open cholecystectomy (OC), was made independently of the patient's preoperative status. Patients' past medical histories; demographic, physiologic, and laboratory data; and postoperative complications were evaluated. When all cholecystectomy patients were arranged into the respective risk groups, the age and severity of illness scores (APS) between LC and OC were not statistically different. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were not significantly different when patients undergoing LC were compared to patients undergoing OC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with decreased hospitalization when compared to patients undergoing OC. The overall mortality of the patients undergoing OC was significantly greater than those undergoing LC. LC is an acceptable surgical alternative for high-risk patients requiring cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8211615     DOI: 10.1007/bf00311728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  35 in total

1.  Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern.

Authors:  A R Moossa; D W Easter; E Van Sonnenberg; G Casola; H D'Agostino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  S C Stain; H Cohen; M Tsuishoysha; A J Donovan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T V Holohan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-09-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Routine fluoroscopic cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an argument.

Authors:  E W Bruhn; F J Miller; J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Cholecystectomy Study Group.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; W Spangenberger; A Dietrich; R Lefering
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Percutaneous endoscopic treatment of cholelithiasis.

Authors:  D P Griffith; P A Rubio; M J Gleeson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Davidoff; T N Pappas; E A Murray; D J Hilleren; R D Johnson; M E Baker; G E Newman; P B Cotton; W C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications.

Authors:  J L Flowers; K A Zucker; S M Graham; W A Scovill; A L Imbembo; R W Bailey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J H Peters; G D Gibbons; J T Innes; K E Nichols; M E Front; S R Roby; E C Ellison
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  8 in total

1.  Endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones in elderly people.

Authors:  T C Tham; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report from a single center.

Authors:  Konstantinos Vagenas; Stavros N Karamanakos; Charalambos Spyropoulos; Spyros Panagiotopoulos; Menelaos Karanikolas; Michalis Stavropoulos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Laparoscopic partial cholecystectomy: A safe and effective alternative surgical technique in "difficult cholecystectomies".

Authors:  Fatih Kulen; Deniz Tihan; Uğur Duman; Emrah Bayam; Gökhan Zaim
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-04-06

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  G M Larson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic and minilap cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  P C Calhoun; L H Adams; M R Adams
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Is intra-operative cholangiography necessary during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A multicentre rural experience from a developing world country.

Authors:  Iqbal Saleem Mir; Mir Mohsin; Omar Kirmani; Tafazul Majid; Khurshid Wani; Mehmood-Ul Hassan; Javed Naqshbandi; Mohammed Maqbool
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Acute cholecystitis: video-laparoscopic versus traditional treatment.

Authors:  P C Amaral; E M Azaro Filho; M P Galvão-Neto; M F Fortes; E L Souza; R S Alcântra; J E Ettinger; A B Regis; M M Sousa; V M do Carmo; P A Santana; E Fahel
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.