Literature DB >> 20385457

Use of a conventional low neck field (LNF) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT): no clinical detriment of IMRT to an anterior LNF during the treatment of head-and neck-cancer.

Aruna Turaka1, Tianyu Li, Nicos Nicolaou, Miriam N Lango, Barbara Burtness, Eric M Horwitz, John A Ridge, Steven J Feigenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine differences in clinical outcomes using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or a standard low neck field (LNF) to treat low neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This is a retrospective, single-institution study. Ninety-one patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with curative intent. According to physician preference, some patients were treated with LNF (Planning Target Volume 3) field using a single anterior photon field matched to the IMRT field. Field junctions were not feathered. The endpoints were time to failure and use of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (as a surrogate of laryngeal edema causing aspiration), and analysis was done with χ(2) and log-rank tests.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 21 months (range, 2-89 months). Median age was 60 years. Thirty-seven patients (41%) were treated with LNF, 84% were Stage III or IV. A PEG tube was required in 30%, as opposed to 33% without the use of LNF. Node 2 or 3 neck disease was treated more commonly without LNF (38% vs. 24%, p = 0.009). Failures occurred in 12 patients (13%). Only 1 patient treated with LNF failed regionally, 4.5 cm above the match line. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 87% and 79% with LNF and without LNF, respectively (p = 0.2), and the 3-year LR failure rate was 4% and 21%, respectively (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Using LNF to treat the low neck did not increase the risk of regional failure "in early T and early N diseases" or decrease PEG tube requirements. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20385457      PMCID: PMC3339153          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

1.  Matching photon and electron fields with dynamic intensity modulation.

Authors:  J G Li; L Xing; A L Boyer; R J Hamilton; D R Spelbring; J V Turian
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Dynamic splitting of large intensity-modulated fields.

Authors:  Q Wu; M Arnfield; S Tong; Y Wu; R Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Improvement of dose distributions in abutment regions of intensity modulated radiation therapy and electron fields.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Leonid B Leybovich; Anil Sethi; Bahman Emami
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Unnecessary laryngeal irradiation in the IMRT era.

Authors:  Robert J Amdur; Jonathan G Li; Chihray Liu; Russell W Hinerman; William M Mendenhall
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Salivary gland sparing and improved target irradiation by conformal and intensity modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Avraham Eisbruch; Jonathan A Ship; Laura A Dawson; Hyungjin M Kim; Carol R Bradford; Jeffrey E Terrell; Douglas B Chepeha; Theodore N Teknos; Norman D Hogikyan; Yoshimi Anzai; Lon H Marsh; Randall K Ten Haken; Gregory T Wolf
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Recurrences near base of skull after IMRT for head-and-neck cancer: implications for target delineation in high neck and for parotid gland sparing.

Authors:  Avraham Eisbruch; Lon H Marsh; Laura A Dawson; Carol R Bradford; Theodoros N Teknos; Douglas B Chepeha; Francis P Worden; Susan Urba; Alexander Lin; Matthew J Schipper; Gregory T Wolf
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  A dynamic supraclavicular field-matching technique for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT.

Authors:  Jun Duan; Sui Shen; Sharon A Spencer; Raef S Ahmed; Richard A Popple; Sung-Joon Ye; Ivan A Brezovich
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  IMRT of large fields: whole-abdomen irradiation.

Authors:  Linda Hong; Kaled Alektiar; Chen Chui; Tom LoSasso; Margie Hunt; Spiridon Spirou; Jay Yang; Howard Amols; Clifton Ling; Zvi Fuks; Steve Leibel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Patterns of failure in patients receiving definitive and postoperative IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  K S Clifford Chao; Gokhan Ozyigit; Binh N Tran; Mustafa Cengiz; James F Dempsey; Daniel A Low
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: the UCSF experience focusing on target volume delineation.

Authors:  Nancy Lee; Ping Xia; Nancy J Fischbein; Pam Akazawa; Clayton Akazawa; Jeanne M Quivey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of full-neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs split-field intensity-modulated head and neck radiation therapy on low neck targets and structures.

Authors:  Shibu J Anamalayil; Boon-Keng K Teo; Alexander Lin; Robert A Lustig; Peter H Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.039

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.