Literature DB >> 10943915

Dynamic splitting of large intensity-modulated fields.

Q Wu1, M Arnfield, S Tong, Y Wu, R Mohan.   

Abstract

The aims of this paper are to describe a method of splitting large intensity-modulated fields that cannot be delivered as a single field and to verify the accuracy of our method. Some multi-leaf collimators may be operated in the dynamic mode to deliver intensity-modulated radiation treatments (IMRT) using the 'sliding window' technique. In this technique each pair of leaves sweeps over the treatment field while the beam is on. However, there are limitations on the width of the field that can be treated due to the limited length of the leaves. For instance, the leaf length of the Varian MLC is 14.5 cm. Since each leaf pair must travel from the left boundary to the right boundary of the beam aperture, the maximum width of the field aperture that can be accommodated in one sweep of leaves is also limited to 14.5 cm, in fact to a slightly smaller value. It has been shown that IMRT is more efficient when used to plan and deliver the large and boost fields simultaneously. In such situations, the fields must be large enough to cover simultaneously the volumes of the gross tumour, microscopic disease and electively treated regions. Such field sizes are often larger than 14.5 cm wide. In this paper, we present a dynamic 'feathering' technique to split the large intensity-modulated fields into smaller fields. In this technique, the component beams overlap each other by a small amount, and the intensity in the overlap region gradually decreases for one field component and increases for the other. The sum of intensities remains the same as for the original field. This method eliminates the field matching problems associated with the conventional step 'break' for static fields. The splitting process is integrated into the IMRT treatment procedure and the entire planning process is automated. Comparison of dose distributions calculated and measured in a phantom showed good agreement. Such a method can be applied to the 'step and shoot' technique as well. IMRT fields of widths up to 25 cm can be delivered by splitting only once, which is adequate for most treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10943915     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/7/302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

1.  Analytic IMRT dose calculations utilizing Monte Carlo to predict MLC fluence modulation.

Authors:  I B Mihaylov; F A Lerma; Y Wu; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Efficient Intensity Map Splitting Algorithms for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wu
Journal:  Inf Process Lett       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 0.959

3.  Use of a conventional low neck field (LNF) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT): no clinical detriment of IMRT to an anterior LNF during the treatment of head-and neck-cancer.

Authors:  Aruna Turaka; Tianyu Li; Nicos Nicolaou; Miriam N Lango; Barbara Burtness; Eric M Horwitz; John A Ridge; Steven J Feigenberg
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shu-Lian Wang; Zhongxing Liao; Helen Liu; Jaffer Ajani; Stephen Swisher; James D Cox; Ritsuko Komaki
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Radiotherapy of large target volumes in Hodgkin's lymphoma: normal tissue sparing capability of forward IMRT versus conventional techniques.

Authors:  Laura Cella; Raffaele Liuzzi; Mario Magliulo; Manuel Conson; Luigi Camera; Marco Salvatore; Roberto Pacelli
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  An Almost Linear Time Algorithm for Field Splitting in Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wu; Xin Dou; John E Bayouth; John M Buatti
Journal:  Comput Geom       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 0.537

7.  Optimal field-splitting algorithm in intensity-modulated radiotherapy: evaluations using head-and-neck and female pelvic IMRT cases.

Authors:  Xin Dou; Yusung Kim; John E Bayouth; John M Buatti; Xiaodong Wu
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 1.482

8.  Evaluation of dose prediction errors and optimization convergence errors of deliverable-based head-and-neck IMRT plans computed with a superposition/convolution dose algorithm.

Authors:  I B Mihaylov; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Dosimetric comparison of high dose rate brachytherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  B Shwetha; M Ravikumar; Siddanna R Palled; Sanjay S Supe; S Sathiyan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-04

10.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma: a case for dose escalation and organ at risk toxicity reduction.

Authors:  Mary Koshy; Jerome C Landry; Joshua D Lawson; Charles A Staley; Natia Esiashvili; Rebecca Howell; Shahram Ghavidel; Lawrence W Davis
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.