Literature DB >> 14999801

Unnecessary laryngeal irradiation in the IMRT era.

Robert J Amdur1, Jonathan G Li, Chihray Liu, Russell W Hinerman, William M Mendenhall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to address the issue of unnecessary irradiation of the normal larynx.
METHODS: We performed a literature review and dosimetry evaluation of intensity modulated radiotheraphy (IMRT) techniques.
RESULTS: Data suggest that matching conventional parallel opposed photon fields through adenopathy is a reasonable alternative to the common practice of unnecessarily irradiating the normal larynx to high doses. The dosimetry evaluation demonstrates that the laryngeal dose is much higher when the entire neck is included in the IMRT field as opposed to using a standard anterior low-neck field below the level of the thyroid notch.
CONCLUSIONS: Lateral opposed fields should not be extended to include the larynx to avoid matching fields through adenopathy. IMRT fields should not include the normal larynx when the laryngeal dose would be substantially lower with a technique that shields the larynx in an anterior low-neck field. Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 26: 257-264, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14999801     DOI: 10.1002/hed.10379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  8 in total

Review 1.  Balancing risk and reward in target delineation for highly conformal radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Avraham Eisbruch; Vincent Gregoire
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  Cohort-based T-SSIM Visual Computing for Radiation Therapy Prediction and Exploration.

Authors:  A Wentzel; P Hanula; T Luciani; B Elgohari; H Elhalawani; G Canahuate; D Vock; C D Fuller; G E Marai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.579

3.  Use of a conventional low neck field (LNF) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT): no clinical detriment of IMRT to an anterior LNF during the treatment of head-and neck-cancer.

Authors:  Aruna Turaka; Tianyu Li; Nicos Nicolaou; Miriam N Lango; Barbara Burtness; Eric M Horwitz; John A Ridge; Steven J Feigenberg
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Effects of full-neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs split-field intensity-modulated head and neck radiation therapy on low neck targets and structures.

Authors:  Shibu J Anamalayil; Boon-Keng K Teo; Alexander Lin; Robert A Lustig; Peter H Ahn
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Comparison of target coverage and dose to organs at risk between simultaneous integrated-boost whole-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy and junctioned intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a conventional radiotherapy field in treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin-Beom Chung; Jeong-Woo Lee; Jae-Sung Kim; In-Ah Kim; Doo-Hyun Lee; Yon-Lae Kim; Kyoung-Sik Choi; Bo-Young Choe; Tae-Suk Suh
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-05-10

6.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy increases dose to the brachial plexus compared with conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A M Chen; W H Hall; B-Q Li; M Guiou; C Wright; M Mathai; A Dublin; J A Purdy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  Pathophysiology of Radiation-Induced Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne N King; Neal E Dunlap; Paul A Tennant; Teresa Pitts
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Development of a standardized method for contouring the larynx and its substructures.

Authors:  Mehee Choi; Tamer Refaat; Malisa S Lester; Ian Bacchus; Alfred W Rademaker; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.481

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.