Literature DB >> 20382929

How the presence of persons biases eye movements.

Jan Zwickel1, Melissa L-H Võ.   

Abstract

We investigated modulation of gaze behavior of observers viewing complex scenes that included a person. To assess spontaneous orientation-following, and in contrast to earlier studies, we did not make the person salient via instruction or low-level saliency. Still, objects that were referred to by the orientation of the person were visited earlier, more often, and longer than when they were not referred to. Analysis of fixation sequences showed that the number of saccades to the cued and uncued objects differed only for saccades that started from the head region, but not for saccades starting from a control object or from a body region. We therefore argue that viewing a person leads to an increase in spontaneous following of the person's viewing direction even when the person plays no role in scene understanding and is not made prominent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382929     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction.

Authors:  S R Langton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-08

2.  Eyes always attract attention but gaze orienting is task-dependent: evidence from eye movement monitoring.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Christina Villate; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  The effect of gaze on gaze direction while looking at art.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich; Raymond M Klein; John Christie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

5.  Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The influence of eye-gaze and arrow pointing distractor cues on voluntary eye movements.

Authors:  Gustav Kuhn; Valerie Benson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-08

Review 7.  Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Magali Batty
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Rapid detection of person information in a naturalistic scene.

Authors:  Sue Fletcher-Watson; John M Findlay; Susan R Leekam; Valerie Benson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically.

Authors:  Gustav Kuhn; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Searching for a perceived gaze direction using eye tracking.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Potential social interactions are important to social attention.

Authors:  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw; Tom Foulsham; Gustav Kuhn; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Attention Capture by Direct Gaze is Robust to Context and Task Demands.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2012-06-01

4.  Reduced gaze following and attention to heads when viewing a "live" social scene.

Authors:  Nicola Jean Gregory; Beatriz Lόpez; Gemma Graham; Paul Marshman; Sarah Bate; Niko Kargas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Preferential Processing of Social Features and Their Interplay with Physical Saliency in Complex Naturalistic Scenes.

Authors:  Albert End; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-30

6.  Asymmetric practices of reading and writing shape visuospatial attention and discrimination.

Authors:  Rita Mendonça; Margarida V Garrido; Gün R Semin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Responding to social and symbolic extrafoveal cues: cue shape trumps biological relevance.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Markus Bindemann; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-26

8.  The Scene Perception & Event Comprehension Theory (SPECT) Applied to Visual Narratives.

Authors:  Lester C Loschky; Adam M Larson; Tim J Smith; Joseph P Magliano
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-09-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.