Literature DB >> 10994231

The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction.

S R Langton1.   

Abstract

Three experiments are reported that investigate the hypothesis that head orientation and gaze direction interact in the processing of another individual's direction of social attention. A Stroop-type interference paradigm was adopted, in which gaze and head cues were placed into conflict. In separate blocks of trials, participants were asked to make speeded keypress responses contingent on either the direction of gaze, or the orientation of the head displayed in a digitized photograph of a male face. In Experiments 1 and 2, head and gaze cues showed symmetrical interference effects. Compared with congruent arrangements, incongruent head cues slowed responses to gaze cues, and incongruent gaze cues slowed responses to head cues, suggesting that head and gaze are mutually influential in the analysis of social attention direction. This mutuality was also evident in a cross-modal version of the task (Experiment 3) where participants responded to spoken directional words whilst ignoring the head/gaze images. It is argued that these interference effects arise from the independent influences of gaze and head orientation on decisions concerning social attention direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10994231     DOI: 10.1080/713755908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  54 in total

1.  Automatic spatial coding of perceived gaze direction is revealed by the Simon effect.

Authors:  Marco Zorzi; Daniela Mapelli; Elena Rusconi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

2.  Eye direction aftereffect.

Authors:  Jun'ichiro Seyama; Ruth S Nagayama
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-09-18

3.  Long-lasting capture of tactile attention by body shadows.

Authors:  Giovanni Galfano; Francesco Pavani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.

Authors:  Alexandra Frischen; Andrew P Bayliss; Steven P Tipper
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  Eye gaze and head orientation modulate the inhibition of return for faces.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Mapping reflexive shifts of attention in eye-centered and hand-centered coordinate systems.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Emiliano Macaluso; Filippo Crostella; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  A novel perceptual trait: gaze predilection for faces during visual exploration.

Authors:  Nitzan Guy; Hagar Azulay; Rasha Kardosh; Yarden Weiss; Ran R Hassin; Salomon Israel; Yoni Pertzov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Asymmetry in Gaze Direction Discrimination Between the Upper and Lower Visual Fields.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Are you looking at me? Mu suppression modulation by facial expression direction.

Authors:  Noga S Ensenberg; Anat Perry; Hillel Aviezer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Following gaze: gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition.

Authors:  Stephen V Shepherd
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.