Literature DB >> 19304621

Look away! Eyes and arrows engage oculomotor responses automatically.

Gustav Kuhn1, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

The present study investigates how people's voluntary saccades are influenced by where another person is looking, even when this is counterpredictive of the intended saccade direction. The color of a fixation point instructed participants to make saccades either to the left or right. These saccade directions were either congruent or incongruent with the eye gaze of a centrally presented schematic face. Participants were asked to ignore the eyes, which were congruent only 20% of the time. At short gaze-fixation-cue stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs; 0 and 100 msec), participants made more directional errors on incongruent than on congruent trials. At a longer SOA (900 msec), the pattern tended to reverse. We demonstrate that a perceived eye gaze results in an automatic saccade following the gaze and that the gaze cue cannot be ignored, even when attending to it is detrimental to the task. Similar results were found for centrally presented arrow cues, suggesting that this interference is not unique to gazes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304621     DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.2.314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  58 in total

1.  Eye-gaze and arrow cues influence elementary sound perception.

Authors:  Jeremy I Borjon; Stephen V Shepherd; Alexander Todorov; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The uniqueness of social attention revisited: working memory load interferes with endogenous but not social orienting.

Authors:  Dana A Hayward; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Are spatial and dimensional attention separate? evidence from Posner, Stroop, and Eriksen tasks.

Authors:  Eran Chajut; Asi Schupak; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-09

4.  Mapping reflexive shifts of attention in eye-centered and hand-centered coordinate systems.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Emiliano Macaluso; Filippo Crostella; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The politics of attention contextualized: gaze but not arrow cuing of attention is moderated by political temperament.

Authors:  Luciana Carraro; Mario Dalmaso; Luigi Castelli; Giovanni Galfano
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-06-09

Review 6.  Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.

Authors:  Mark A Atkinson; Andrew A Simpson; Geoff G Cole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

7.  Impaired reflexive orienting to social cues in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Andrea Marotta; Maria Casagrande; Caterina Rosa; Lisa Maccari; Bianca Berloco; Augusto Pasini
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  Is gaze following purely reflexive or goal-directed instead? Revisiting the automaticity of orienting attention by gaze cues.

Authors:  Paola Ricciardelli; Samuele Carcagno; Giuseppe Vallar; Emanuela Bricolo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Following gaze: gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition.

Authors:  Stephen V Shepherd
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19

10.  Differential activation of frontoparietal attention networks by social and symbolic spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; Lauri Nummenmaa; Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Richard N Henson; James V Haxby; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.