Literature DB >> 20382459

User satisfaction is influenced by the interval between a health care service and the assessment of the service.

Hanne Irene Jensen1, Jette Ammentorp2, Poul-Erik Kofoed3.   

Abstract

In order to improve the quality of patient care, questionnaires are often used to identify user's experiences and evaluations, but only a few studies have examined whether measuring user satisfaction at different time points influences the assessment of health care. Several studies have shown equivalency between paper and electronic patient reported outcomes; however, none of these studies have considered the fact that electronic questionnaires are usually completed at the hospital, while paper questionnaires are typically completed at home weeks after the visit. In order to ensure that the comparison of results collected by the two different methods are not biased, the aim of this study was to determine if the interval between an outpatient visit and the assessment of the quality of care influences user satisfaction and to compare response rates between questionnaires completed at different times. In a follow-up study, parents from a paediatric outpatient clinic in Denmark were quasi-randomised to 1 of 3 groups: group 1 completed an electronic questionnaire on a touch screen computer in the outpatient clinic and a paper questionnaire 3-6 weeks after the visit; group 2 completed a paper questionnaire in the outpatient clinic and a paper questionnaire 3-6 weeks after the visit; and group 3 completed a paper questionnaire 3-6 weeks after the visit. A total of 1148 parents completed at least 1 questionnaire. User satisfaction was significantly lower when the assessment was made after a visit to the outpatient clinic compared to an assessment made at the clinic. The response rates of questionnaires completed at the clinic were significantly higher than the response rates of questionnaires completed after the visit. Both the timing of surveys and response rates need to be taken into consideration when planning user surveys. Outcomes from surveys conducted at different times are not readily comparable. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382459     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  12 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction with integrated HIV and antenatal care services in rural Kenya.

Authors:  Baotran N Vo; Craig R Cohen; Rachel M Smith; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Maricianah A Onono; Katie Schwartz; Sierra Washington; Janet M Turan
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2012-02-01

2.  Improving Response Rates and Representation of Hard-to-Reach Groups in Family Experience Surveys.

Authors:  Sara L Toomey; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jessica Quinn; David J Klein; Stephanie Wagner; Cassandra Thomson; Melody Wu; Sarah Onorato; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  Measuring the patient experience in primary care: Comparing e-mail and waiting room survey delivery in a family health team.

Authors:  Morgan Slater; Tara Kiran
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Hope, happiness and home treatment: a study into patient satisfaction with being treated at home.

Authors:  Dieneke Hubbeling; Robert Bertram
Journal:  Psychiatr Bull (2014)       Date:  2014-12

5.  Evaluating CollaboRATE in a clinical setting: analysis of mode effects on scores, response rates and costs of data collection.

Authors:  Paul J Barr; Rachel C Forcino; Rachel Thompson; Elissa M Ozanne; Roger Arend; Molly Ganger Castaldo; A James O'Malley; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Multisite Quality Improvement Study of a Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program.

Authors:  Rachel Jug; Adam L Booth; Anne F Buckley; Jordan Newell; Joshua Kesterson; Jerad M Gardner; Lerna Ozcan; Beiyu Liu; Cynthia L Green; Lija Joseph; Thomas J Cummings
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  The association between survey timing and patient-reported experiences with hospitals: results of a national postal survey.

Authors:  Oyvind A Bjertnaes
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  A simple and reliable health monitoring system for shoulder health: proposal.

Authors:  Shuo-Fang Liu; Yann-Long Lee
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2014-02-26

9.  Perceived quality of care for common childhood illnesses: facility versus community based providers in Uganda.

Authors:  Agnes Nanyonjo; Fredrick Makumbi; Patrick Etou; Göran Tomson; Karin Källander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Patient Satisfaction Surveys in the Outpatient Clinic Setting: The Variability of Response With Positively or Negatively Toned Questions.

Authors:  Brittany Saldivar; Carolyn Carter; Stephanie L Filipp; Matthew J Gurka; Michael K Davis
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.