Literature DB >> 27965350

Measuring the patient experience in primary care: Comparing e-mail and waiting room survey delivery in a family health team.

Morgan Slater1, Tara Kiran2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics and responses of patients completing a patient experience survey accessed online after e-mail notification or delivered in the waiting room using tablet computers.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional comparison of 2 methods of delivering a patient experience survey.
SETTING: A large family health team in Toronto, Ont. PARTICIPANTS: Family practice patients aged 18 or older who completed an e-mail survey between January and June 2014 (N = 587) or who completed the survey in the waiting room in July and August 2014 (N = 592). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of respondent demographic characteristics and responses to questions related to access and patient-centredness.
RESULTS: Patients responding to the e-mail survey were more likely to live in higher-income neighbourhoods (P = .0002), be between the ages of 35 and 64 (P = .0147), and be female (P = .0434) compared with those responding to the waiting room survey; there were no significant differences related to self-rated health. The differences in neighbourhood income were noted despite minimal differences between patients with and without e-mail addresses included in their medical records. There were few differences in responses to the survey questions between the 2 survey methods and any differences were explained by the underlying differences in patient demographic characteristics.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that respondent demographic characteristics might differ depending on the method of survey delivery, and these differences might affect survey responses. Methods of delivering patient experience surveys that require electronic literacy might underrepresent patients living in low-income neighbourhoods. Practices should consider evaluating for nonresponse bias and adjusting for patient demographic characteristics when interpreting survey results. Further research is needed to understand how primary care practices can optimize electronic survey delivery methods to survey a representative sample of patients. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27965350      PMCID: PMC5154665     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  28 in total

1.  The increasing importance of patient surveys.

Authors:  P D Cleary
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

2.  Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?

Authors:  Elizabeth T Miller; Dan J Neal; Lisa J Roberts; John S Baer; Sally O Cressler; Jane Metrik; G Alan Marlatt
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2002-03

Review 3.  Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality.

Authors:  Ann Bowling
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  Equivalence of mail and telephone responses to the CAHPS Hospital Survey.

Authors:  Han de Vries; Marc N Elliott; Kimberly A Hepner; San D Keller; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Self-rated health assessed by web versus mail modes in a mixed mode survey: the digital divide effect and the genuine survey mode effect.

Authors:  Jae-Mahn Shim; Eunjung Shin; Timothy P Johnson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Patient satisfaction at and after discharge. Effect of a time lag.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Inge H F Reininga; Natalie A D Boss; Jim R van Horn
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-10-25

7.  Time does not heal all wounds. Patients report lower satisfaction levels as time goes by.

Authors:  D Bendall-Lyon; T L Powers; J E Swan
Journal:  Mark Health Serv       Date:  2001

8.  Effect of a general practitioner's consulting style on patients' satisfaction: a controlled study.

Authors:  R Savage; D Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-10-27

9.  Patient satisfaction following day surgery.

Authors:  Paulo Lemos; Ana Pinto; Gustavo Morais; José Pereira; Rui Loureiro; Sofia Teixeira; Catarina S Nunes
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.452

10.  Understanding ethnic and other socio-demographic differences in patient experience of primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey.

Authors:  G Lyratzopoulos; M Elliott; J M Barbiere; A Henderson; L Staetsky; C Paddison; J Campbell; M Roland
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  11 in total

1.  Suicidality and associated risk factors in outpatients attending a general medical facility in rural Kenya.

Authors:  L Ongeri; C E McCulloch; T C Neylan; E Bukusi; S B Macfarlane; C Othieno; A K Ngugi; S M Meffert
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Assessing the representativeness of physician and patient respondents to a primary care survey using administrative data.

Authors:  Allanah Li; Shawna Cronin; Yu Qing Bai; Kevin Walker; Mehdi Ammi; William Hogg; Sabrina T Wong; Walter P Wodchis
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Preserved expressive language as a phenotypic determinant of Mosaic Angelman Syndrome.

Authors:  Robert P Carson; Lynne Bird; Anna K Childers; Ferrin Wheeler; Jessica Duis
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  Evaluating Digital Maturity and Patient Acceptability of Real-Time Patient Experience Feedback Systems: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mustafa Khanbhai; Kelsey Flott; Ara Darzi; Erik Mayer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Differences in Mode Preferences, Response Rates, and Mode Effect Between Automated Email and Phone Survey Systems for Patients of Primary Care Practices: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sharon Johnston; William Hogg; Sabrina T Wong; Fred Burge; Sandra Peterson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  ASK ME!-Routine measurement of patient experience with patient safety in ambulatory care: A mixed-mode survey.

Authors:  Katja Stahl; Oliver Groene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Collaborative Development of an Older Adult Experience Survey for Specialized Geriatric Services.

Authors:  Ronaye Gilsenan; Rhonda Schwartz; Iris A Gutmanis; Adam M B Day; David P Ryan; Rosemary R A Brander; Kelly Milne; Frank Molnar
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2021-06-01

8.  Association Between Adherence to Cancer Screening and Knowledge of Screening Guidelines: Feasibility Study Linking Self-Reported Survey Data With Medical Records.

Authors:  Aisha K Lofters; Deanna Telner; Sumeet Kalia; Morgan Slater
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2018-11-01

9.  Ten tips for advancing a culture of improvement in primary care.

Authors:  Tara Kiran; Noor Ramji; Mary Beth Derocher; Rajesh Girdhari; Samantha Davie; Margarita Lam-Antoniades
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Partnering with patients to improve access to primary care.

Authors:  Sam Davie; Tara Kiran
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.