Literature DB >> 33367493

Multisite Quality Improvement Study of a Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program.

Rachel Jug1, Adam L Booth2, Anne F Buckley1, Jordan Newell3, Joshua Kesterson4, Jerad M Gardner5, Lerna Ozcan6, Beiyu Liu7, Cynthia L Green7, Lija Joseph8, Thomas J Cummings1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this multisite quality improvement study was to evaluate patients' experiences with the patient-centered pathology (PCP) consultation program and to determine whether PCP enhanced their care experience.
METHODS: Patients were invited to attend PCP consultations to review their pathology report and slides and have their questions answered by the pathologist privately, with the option to attend the appointment with family members or friends for support. A patient experience questionnaire (PEQ) was administered to patients, who participated voluntarily in the PCP, and survey data were collected and stored in REDCap. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute).
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (95.5% female) aged 18 to 84 years across 4 institutions completed the PEQ. Overall, 58% and 15.8% of patients had breast and brain tumors, respectively, and 59.7% of tumors were newly diagnosed. Most patients thought it was important for them to learn as much as they could about their health condition. However, the majority of patients reported some degree of difficulty learning about their health condition based on written information, despite 97% having completed high school and/or further education. The majority of patients rated their pathologist as "excellent" across communication metrics. Ultimately, 100% of respondents were satisfied, found their visits to be useful, and would recommend the PCP to other patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients found that personalized clinical encounters with pathologists improved their understanding of their health condition and their satisfaction with their care experience. Patients thought pathologists communicated respectfully, effectively, and empathetically. © American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pathologist; Patient consultation; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33367493      PMCID: PMC8130872          DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  8 in total

1.  "Please Help Me See the Dragon I Am Slaying": Implementation of a Novel Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program and Survey of Patient Experience.

Authors:  Adam L Booth; Matthew S Katz; Michael J Misialek; Timothy Craig Allen; Lija Joseph
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  The Patient-Pathologist Consultation Program: A Mixed-Methods Study of Interest and Motivations in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Cathryn J Lapedis; Jennifer K Horowitz; Lisa Brown; Brian E Tolle; Lauren B Smith; Scott R Owens
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  The essential role of pathologists in health care and health policy.

Authors:  Ryan C Romano; Timothy Craig Allen; Melissa M Blessing
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.534

4.  Emerging From the Basement: The Visible Pathologist.

Authors:  Ian M Harrold; Sarah M Bean; Nicole C Williams
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Talking to Myself.

Authors:  Adam Booth; Timothy Craig Allen
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  User satisfaction is influenced by the interval between a health care service and the assessment of the service.

Authors:  Hanne Irene Jensen; Jette Ammentorp; Poul-Erik Kofoed
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Putting the patient at the centre of pathology: an innovative approach to patient education-MyPathologyReport.ca.

Authors:  Anthea Lafreniere; Bibianna Purgina; Jason K Wasserman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  The association between survey timing and patient-reported experiences with hospitals: results of a national postal survey.

Authors:  Oyvind A Bjertnaes
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.