Literature DB >> 2037665

Comparison of Directigen FLU-A with viral isolation and direct immunofluorescence for the rapid detection and identification of influenza A virus.

J L Waner1, S J Todd, H Shalaby, P Murphy, L V Wall.   

Abstract

Directigen FLU-A, an enzyme immunoassay membrane test, was compared prospectively to isolation in cell culture and direct immunofluorescence (IF) for the detection of influenza A virus. One hundred ninety specimens were evaluated by Directigen FLU-A and cell culture; 184 of these specimens were also tested by direct IF. The sensitivity of Directigen FLU-A compared to isolation in cell culture and direct IF was 100%. The specificities of Directigen FLU-A compared to isolation and direct IF were identical, 91.6%. Fourteen specimens that were positive by Directigen FLU-A did not yield virus in culture; two of the specimens, however, were positive by direct IF, and four other specimens were not specimens of choice for the test. A positive Directigen result had positive predictive values of 62.6 and 75.0% compared to isolation and direct IF, respectively; a positive Directigen result with an intensity reading of 2+ or greater, however, had positive predictive values of 85 and 100% compared to isolation and direct IF, respectively. In all comparisons, the negative predictive value was 100%. There was no evidence that cross-reactivity occurred with non-influenza A antigens. Directigen FLU-A should serve as a convenient screening test for influenza A and as a rapid test supported by isolation in cell culture during an influenza outbreak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2037665      PMCID: PMC269804          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.3.479-482.1991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  21 in total

1.  Enzyme immunoassay for direct detection of influenza type A and adenovirus antigens in clinical specimens.

Authors:  M W Harmon; K M Pawlik
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A controlled trial of amantadine and rimantadine in the prophylaxis of influenza A infection.

Authors:  R Dolin; R C Reichman; H P Madore; R Maynard; P N Linton; J Webber-Jones
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Production of monoclonal antibodies against parainfluenza 3 virus and their use in diagnosis by immunofluorescence.

Authors:  J L Waner; N J Whitehurst; T Downs; D G Graves
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of different tissue cultures for isolation and quantitation of influenza and parainfluenza viruses.

Authors:  A L Frank; R B Couch; C A Griffis; B D Baxter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Monoclonal antibodies for the rapid diagnosis of influenza A and B virus infections by immunofluorescence.

Authors:  J McQuillin; C R Madeley; A P Kendal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Comparison of polyclonal antiserum versus monoclonal antibodies for the rapid diagnosis of influenza A virus infections by immunofluorescence in clinical specimens.

Authors:  I Shalit; P A McKee; H Beauchamp; J L Waner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid diagnosis of influenza A infection by direct immunofluorescence of nasopharyngeal aspirates in adults.

Authors:  J A Daisy; F S Lief; H M Friedman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid viral diagnosis of acute respiratory infections: comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the immunofluorescence technique for detection of viral antigens in nasopharyngeal secretions.

Authors:  M Grandien; C A Pettersson; P S Gardner; A Linde; A Stanton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Monoclonal antibodies for rapid, strain-specific identification of influenza virus isolates.

Authors:  N J Schmidt; M Ota; D Gallo; V L Fox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Detection of influenza A virus by radioimmunoassay and enzyme-immunoassay from nasopharyngeal specimens.

Authors:  H K Sarkkinen; P E Halonen; A A Salmi
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.327

View more
  24 in total

1.  Impact of sample type on rapid detection of influenza virus A by cytospin-enhanced immunofluorescence and membrane enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  M L Landry; S Cohen; D Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Practical and sensitive screening strategy for detection of influenza virus.

Authors:  Duane W Newton; Cindy F Mellen; Barbara D Baxter; Robert L Atmar; Marilyn A Menegus
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of a new dot blot enzyme immunoassay (directigen flu A+B) for simultaneous and differential detection of influenza a and B virus antigens from respiratory samples.

Authors:  Jordi Reina; Emma Padilla; Fermin Alonso; Enrique Ruiz De Gopegui; Maria Munar; Margarita Mari
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid Tests for Influenza.

Authors:  Constance T Pachucki
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Direct detection of influenza virus antigen in nasopharyngeal specimens by direct enzyme immunoassay in comparison with quantitating virus shedding.

Authors:  G Döller; W Schuy; K Y Tjhen; B Stekeler; H J Gerth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Application of subtype-specific monoclonal antibodies for rapid detection and identification of influenza A and B viruses.

Authors:  M Ueda; A Maeda; N Nakagawa; T Kase; R Kubota; H Takakura; A Ohshima; Y Okuno
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Application of Directigen FLU-A for the detection of influenza A virus in human and nonhuman specimens.

Authors:  K A Ryan-Poirier; J M Katz; R G Webster; Y Kawaoka
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Typing and subtyping of influenza viruses in clinical samples by PCR.

Authors:  K E Wright; G A Wilson; D Novosad; C Dimock; D Tan; J M Weber
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Suboptimal detection of influenza virus in adults by the Directigen Flu A+B enzyme immunoassay and correlation of results with the number of antigen-positive cells detected by cytospin immunofluorescence.

Authors:  Marie L Landry; David Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of rapid diagnostic techniques for respiratory syncytial and influenza A virus respiratory infections in young children.

Authors:  E A Dominguez; L H Taber; R B Couch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.