Literature DB >> 10618134

Impact of sample type on rapid detection of influenza virus A by cytospin-enhanced immunofluorescence and membrane enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

M L Landry1, S Cohen, D Ferguson.   

Abstract

Cytospin-enhanced direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA) detected 49 (92.5%) and rapid membrane enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) detected 40 (75.5%) of 53 influenza virus A-positive samples. All 15 positive nasopharyngeal aspirates from children were detected by both tests. In contrast, 34 of 38 (89.5%) positive swabs from adults were detected by DFA, but only 25 (66%) were detected by ELISA.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 10618134      PMCID： PMC88742          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.38.1.429-430.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of Directigen FLU-A with viral isolation and direct immunofluorescence for the rapid detection and identification of influenza A virus.

Authors:  J L Waner; S J Todd; H Shalaby; P Murphy; L V Wall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Use of fluorescent-antibody staining of cytocentrifuge-prepared smears in combination with cell culture for direct detection of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  K M Doing; M A Jerkofsky; E G Dow; J A Jellison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of herpes simplex virus in clinical specimens by cytospin-enhanced direct immunofluorescence.

Authors:  M L Landry; D Ferguson; J Wlochowski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Efficacy and safety of the neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir in the treatment of influenzavirus infections. GG167 Influenza Study Group.

Authors:  F G Hayden; A D Osterhaus; J J Treanor; D M Fleming; F Y Aoki; K G Nicholson; A M Bohnen; H M Hirst; O Keene; K Wightman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Influenza among hospitalized adults with leukemia.

Authors:  H M Yousuf; J Englund; R Couch; K Rolston; M Luna; J Goodrich; V Lewis; N Q Mirza; M Andreeff; C Koller; L Elting; G P Bodey; E Whimbey
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Identification of influenza A virus by shell vial culture and two commercially available antigen detection methods.

Authors:  L L Steed; V C Salmon; J C Overall
Journal:  Clin Diagn Virol       Date:  1994-08

7.  Comparison of rapid detection methods for influenza A virus and their value in health-care management of institutionalized geriatric patients.

Authors:  G P Leonardi; H Leib; G S Birkhead; C Smith; P Costello; W Conron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirate and nasopharyngeal swab specimens for respiratory syncytial virus diagnosis by cell culture, indirect immunofluorescence assay, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  G Ahluwalia; J Embree; P McNicol; B Law; G W Hammond
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.948
  8 in total
  20 in total

1.  Pulmonary infiltrates in immunosuppressed patients: analysis of a diagnostic protocol.

Authors:  Cristina Danés; Julián González-Martín; Tomàs Pumarola; Ana Rañó; Natividad Benito; Antoni Torres; Asunción Moreno; Montserrat Rovira; Jorge Puig de la Bellacasa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  SimulFluor respiratory screen for rapid detection of multiple respiratory viruses in clinical specimens by immunofluorescence staining.

Authors:  M L Landry; D Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Clinical evaluation of the ZstatFlu-II test: a chemiluminescent rapid diagnostic test for influenza virus.

Authors:  Marilyn S Hamilton; David M Abel; Yolanda J Ballam; Mary K Otto; Angela F Nickell; Lisa M Pence; James R Appleman; Craig D Shimasaki; Komandoor E Achyuthan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of the Binax NOW Flu A enzyme immunochromatographic assay and R-Mix shell vial culture for the 2003-2004 influenza season.

Authors:  Robert C Fader
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of flocked and rayon swabs for collection of respiratory epithelial cells from uninfected volunteers and symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Peter Daley; Santina Castriciano; Max Chernesky; Marek Smieja
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Emerging technologies for the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Suboptimal detection of influenza virus in adults by the Directigen Flu A+B enzyme immunoassay and correlation of results with the number of antigen-positive cells detected by cytospin immunofluorescence.

Authors:  Marie L Landry; David Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test, NanoSign® Influenza A/B Antigen, for detection of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1 viruses.

Authors:  Gyu-Cheol Lee; Eun-Sung Jeon; Won-Shik Kim; Dung Tien Le; Jong-Ha Yoo; Chom-Kyu Chong
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 4.099

Review 10.  Detection of respiratory viruses using non-molecular based methods.

Authors:  Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.168
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.