Literature DB >> 12202608

Evaluation of a new dot blot enzyme immunoassay (directigen flu A+B) for simultaneous and differential detection of influenza a and B virus antigens from respiratory samples.

Jordi Reina1, Emma Padilla, Fermin Alonso, Enrique Ruiz De Gopegui, Maria Munar, Margarita Mari.   

Abstract

We report a prospective evaluation of a new dot blot enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for the direct, rapid, qualitative, simultaneous, and differential detection of the influenza A (IA) and B (IB) virus antigen in different respiratory samples. The EIA method was compared with the shell vial culture system (MDCK cell line) used with the same samples. We studied 160 samples from 93 (58.1%) pediatric patients (hospital emergency room) and from 67 (41.9%) adult patients (sentinel network). Seventy-four(46.2%) samples were considered positive; of them, 46 (62.2%) were from pediatric patients and 28 (37.8%) were from an adult group (P < 0.05), with overall positive values of 49.9% and 41.7%, respectively. All 74 (100%) of the positive samples were isolated in cell culture versus the 68.9% that were detected as positive by the new EIA method (P < 0.05). Of the 41 samples positive for the IA virus, the EIA detected 34 (82.9%) positive samples; of the 33 samples positive for the IB virus, the EIA detected 17 (51.5%) positive samples (P < 0.05). No false-positive reaction was detected with the EIA method (specificity and positive predictive value of 100%). The overall results obtained in the comparison between the new EIA and the shell vial culture had a sensibility of 82.9% and predictive negative values of 92.4% for the IA virus and 51.5% and 84.3%, respectively, for the IB virus. This evaluation shows sensitivity and specificity percentages for the new EIA method that is acceptable for routine use in IA virus detection. The results obtained were worse for IB virus detection, but this new EIA method is actually the only one with the capacity to differentiate between the two influenza viruses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12202608      PMCID: PMC130707          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.9.3515-3517.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of two nested PCR, cell culture, and antigen detection for the diagnosis of upper respiratory tract infections due to influenza viruses.

Authors:  C Magnard; M Valette; M Aymard; B Lina
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.327

2.  Evaluation of a direct immunofluorescence assay, dot-blot enzyme immunoassay, and shell vial culture in the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections caused by influenza A virus.

Authors:  J Reina; M Munar; I Blanco
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Performance of virus isolation and Directigen Flu A to detect influenza A virus in experimental human infection.

Authors:  L Kaiser; M S Briones; F G Hayden
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.168

4.  Comparison of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (MDCK) with a green monkey continuous cell line (Vero) and human lung embryonated cells (MRC-5) in the isolation of influenza A virus from nasopharyngeal aspirates by shell vial culture.

Authors:  J Reina; V Fernandez-Baca; I Blanco; M Munar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Use of the selective oral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir to prevent influenza.

Authors:  F G Hayden; R L Atmar; M Schilling; C Johnson; D Poretz; D Paar; L Huson; P Ward; R G Mills
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-10-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Comparison of four clinical specimen types for detection of influenza A and B viruses by optical immunoassay (FLU OIA test) and cell culture methods.

Authors:  K A Covalciuc; K H Webb; C A Carlson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Influenza.

Authors:  N J Cox; K Subbarao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Comparison of a new neuraminidase detection assay with an enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence, and culture for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses in nasal wash specimens.

Authors:  D E Noyola; B Clark; F T O'Donnell; R L Atmar; J Greer; G J Demmler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Influenza diagnosis: from dark isolation into the molecular light. West of Scotland Respiratory Virus Study Group.

Authors:  L A Wallace; K A McAulay; J D Douglas; A G Elder; D J Stott; W F Carman
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.072

Review 10.  Influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors.

Authors:  L V Gubareva; L Kaiser; F G Hayden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  12 in total

1.  Multiplex RT-PCR and indirect immunofluorescence assays for detection and subtyping of human influenza virus in Tunisia.

Authors:  Manel Ben M'hadheb; Myriam Harrabi; Amira Souii; Nadia Jrad-Battikh; Jawhar Gharbi
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Comparison of the Denka-Seiken INFLU A.B-Quick and BD Directigen Flu A+B kits with direct fluorescent-antibody staining and shell vial culture methods for rapid detection of influenza viruses.

Authors:  James J Dunn; Chris Gordon; Christy Kelley; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Optimal sampling sites and methods for detection of pathogens possibly causing community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  K Loens; L Van Heirstraeten; S Malhotra-Kumar; H Goossens; M Ieven
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  [Contribution of microbiological investigations to the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections].

Authors:  O Leroy
Journal:  Med Mal Infect       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.152

5.  Rapid method for detection of influenza a and B virus antigens by use of a two-photon excitation assay technique and dry-chemistry reagents.

Authors:  Janne O Koskinen; Raija Vainionpää; Niko J Meltola; Jori Soukka; Pekka E Hänninen; Aleksi E Soini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of viral isolation and multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR for confirmation of respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus detection by antigen immunoassays.

Authors:  R S Liao; L L Tomalty; A Majury; D E Zoutman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Development and application of reference antisera against 15 hemagglutinin subtypes of influenza virus by DNA vaccination of chickens.

Authors:  Chang-Won Lee; Dennis A Senne; David L Suarez
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2006-03

8.  Comparison of SmartCycler real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay in a public health laboratory with direct immunofluorescence and cell culture assays in a medical center for detection of influenza A virus.

Authors:  Nadia F Habib-Bein; William H Beckwith; Donald Mayo; Marie L Landry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Viral agents causing lower respiratory tract infections in hospitalized children: evaluation of the Speed-Oligo® RSV assay for the detection of respiratory syncytial virus.

Authors:  W Sánchez-Yebra; J A Ávila-Carrillo; F Giménez-Sánchez; A Reyes-Bertos; M Sánchez-Forte; M Morales-Torres; A Rojas; J Mendoza
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Cost-effectiveness of antiviral stockpiling and near-patient testing for potential influenza pandemic.

Authors:  M Ruby Siddiqui; W John Edmunds
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.