Literature DB >> 20376183

Factors likely to affect the long-term results of ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction.

Beatrice Brembilla-Perrot1, Pierre Yves Zinzius, Laurent Groben, Luc Freysz, Lucian Muresan, Jerome Schwartz, Raphael P Martins, Soumaya Jarmouni, Ibrahim Nossier, Nicolas Sadoul, Hugues Blangy, Arnaud Terrier De La Chaise, Pierre Louis, Olivier Selton, Daniel Beurrier, Jean Marc Sellal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The results of programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) may change after myocardial infarction (MI). The objective was to study the factors that could predict the results of a second PVS.
METHODS: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and QRS duration were determined and PVS performed within 3 to 14 years of one another (mean 7.5+/-5) in 50 patients studied systematically between 1 and 3 months after acute MI.
RESULTS: QRS duration increased from 120+/-23 ms to 132+/-29 (p 0.04). LVEF did not decrease significantly (36+/-12 % vs 37+/-13 %). Ventricular tachycardia with cycle length (CL) > 220ms (VT) was induced in 11 patients at PVS 1, who had inducible VT with a CL > 220 ms (8) or < 220 ms (ventricular flutter, VFl) (3) at PVS 2. VFl or fibrillation (VF) was induced in 14 patients at PVS 1 and remained inducible in 5; 5 patients had inducible VT and 4 had a negative 2nd PVS. 2. 25 patients had initially negative PVS; 7 had secondarily inducible VT, 4 a VFl/VF, 14 a negative PVS. Changes of PVS were related to initially increasing QRS duration and secondarily changes in LVEF and revascularization but not to the number of extrastimuli required to induce VFl.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients without induced VT at first study, changes of PVS are possible during the life. Patients with initially long QRS duration and those who developed decreased LVEF are more at risk to have inducible monomorphic VT at 2nd study, than other patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  follow-up; myocardial infarction; programmed ventricular stimulation; reproducibility

Year:  2010        PMID: 20376183      PMCID: PMC2847866     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J        ISSN: 0972-6292


  32 in total

Review 1.  A critical appraisal of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Roderick Tung; Peter Zimetbaum; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Association of ventricular arrhythmias with left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A D Popović; A N Nesković; K Pavlovski; J Marinković; R Babić; M Bojić; M Tan; J D Thomas
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Significance of inducible ventricular flutter-fibrillation after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Béatrice Brembilla-Perrot; Christine Suty-Selton; Olivier Claudon; Arnaud Terrier de la Chaise; Pierre Louis; Marc Nippert; Batric Popovic; Hugues Blangy; Emad Khaldi; Hadj Belhakem; Daniel Beurrier; Pierre Houriez
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Incidence and clinical significance of induced ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  C J Vandepol; A Farshidi; S R Spielman; A M Greenspan; L N Horowitz; M E Josephson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction does not help reduce the risk of ventricular events.

Authors:  B Brembilla-Perrot; L Jacquemin; A Terrier de la Chaise; D Beurrier
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Incidence and determinants of multiple morphologically distinct sustained ventricular tachycardias.

Authors:  D J Wilber; M J Davis; M Rosenbaum; J N Ruskin; H Garan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Response to programmed ventricular stimulation: sensitivity, specificity and relation to heart disease.

Authors:  F D Livelli; J T Bigger; J A Reiffel; E S Gang; J N Patton; P M Noethling; L M Rolnitzky; J I Gliklich
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Long-term reproducibility of responses to programmed cardiac stimulation in spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Authors:  M H Schoenfeld; B McGovern; H Garan; J N Ruskin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Ventricular late potentials and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias as a marker for ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Breithardt; M Borggrefe; K Haerten
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Ventricular arrhythmia inducibility predicts subsequent ICD activation in nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients: a DEFINITE substudy.

Authors:  James P Daubert; Stephen L Winters; Haris Subacius; Ronald D Berger; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Sarah G Taylor; Andi Schaechter; Adam Howard; Alan Kadish
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.