Literature DB >> 7113929

Response to programmed ventricular stimulation: sensitivity, specificity and relation to heart disease.

F D Livelli, J T Bigger, J A Reiffel, E S Gang, J N Patton, P M Noethling, L M Rolnitzky, J I Gliklich.   

Abstract

This prospective study of 100 patients evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the repetitive ventricular response and ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation for identifying patients with spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The influence of underlying heart disease on such sensitivity and specificity was also evaluated. The repetitive ventricular response was sensitive (92 percent) for detecting patients with prior spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but lacked specificity (57 percent); the rate of false positive responses was 43 percent. Inducible ventricular tachycardia was less sensitive (65 percent) but more specific (98 percent); the rate of false positive responses was only 3 percent. Among the 100 patients, 71 had heart disease, 29 did not. The presence of underlying heart disease had no significant effect on the sensitivity and specificity of repetitive ventricular responses or ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed stimulation; it did not increase the rate of false positive responses. It is concluded that (1) ventricular tachycardia induced with programmed ventricular stimulation is an excellent basis for guiding the management of clinically significant ventricular tachyarrhythmias, regardless of underlying heart disease; and (2) the repetitive ventricular response is not useful for this purpose because of its high rate of false positive responses among patients with or without significant heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7113929     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90309-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Programmed stimulation in the evaluation of life-threatening or potentially life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  C Gottlieb; M E Josephson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.727

2.  Uncertainties about interpretation of ventricular stimulation studies in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Authors:  K Robinson; D M Krikler
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-08

3.  Factors likely to affect the long-term results of ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Beatrice Brembilla-Perrot; Pierre Yves Zinzius; Laurent Groben; Luc Freysz; Lucian Muresan; Jerome Schwartz; Raphael P Martins; Soumaya Jarmouni; Ibrahim Nossier; Nicolas Sadoul; Hugues Blangy; Arnaud Terrier De La Chaise; Pierre Louis; Olivier Selton; Daniel Beurrier; Jean Marc Sellal
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-04-01

4.  Inducible multiform ventricular tachycardia in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Authors:  B Brembilla-Perrot; A Terrier de la Chaise; K Isaaz; F Marçon; F Cherrier; C Pernot
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-08

5.  Clinical significance of rapid ventricular tachycardia (> 270 beats per minute) provoked at programmed stimulation in patients without confirmed rapid ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  B Brembilla-Perrot; A Terrier de la Chaise; S Briançon; M Takoordial; C Suty-Selton; B Thiel; J L Brua
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.