Literature DB >> 3720767

Ventricular late potentials and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias as a marker for ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction.

G Breithardt, M Borggrefe, K Haerten.   

Abstract

To assess the predictive value of ventricular late potentials and programmed ventricular stimulation, 379 patients without a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia, dizziness or syncope were studied prospectively. Group I included patients referred for coronary angiography. Group II consisted of patients who survived an episode of acute myocardial infarction and who were studied within 6 weeks after onset. During follow-up (mean 13 months), 16 patients died. Six of these patients died suddenly within one hour. The prevalence of sudden cardiac death was lower (0.8%) in group I compared to group II (3.0%). There was no correlation between results of both methods and the subsequent occurrence of sudden cardiac death. Symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia was documented in 10 patients (2.6%). Only one patient in group I later developed symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia in contrast to nine cases in group II. Symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia could be predicted in patients in the early postmyocardial infarction period (group II). By using various combinations of parameters, the highest predictive value for subsequent sustained ventricular tachycardia was reached by the following combination: Late potentials of 40 ms duration or more, induction of monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia at rates below 270 beats min-1 and interval after myocardial infarction less than 6 weeks. In conclusion, both techniques seemed to be promising for the identification of patients at risk of ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3720767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  6 in total

1.  [Functional late potential analysis in the 24-hour electrocardiogram].

Authors:  P Steinbigler; R Haberl; J Vogel; I Schmücking; A Spiegl; G Steinbeck
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-12

2.  Effect of parasympathetic blockade on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram.

Authors:  E H Christiansen; O Frøbert
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.435

3.  Time course of ventricular arrhythmias and the signal averaged electrocardiogram in the post-infarction period: a prospective study of correlation.

Authors:  G Turitto; E B Caref; G Macina; J M Fontaine; S N Ursell; N el-Sherif
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-07

4.  Factors likely to affect the long-term results of ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Beatrice Brembilla-Perrot; Pierre Yves Zinzius; Laurent Groben; Luc Freysz; Lucian Muresan; Jerome Schwartz; Raphael P Martins; Soumaya Jarmouni; Ibrahim Nossier; Nicolas Sadoul; Hugues Blangy; Arnaud Terrier De La Chaise; Pierre Louis; Olivier Selton; Daniel Beurrier; Jean Marc Sellal
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2010-04-01

5.  Programmed ventricular stimulation after myocardial infarction does not help reduce the risk of ventricular events.

Authors:  B Brembilla-Perrot; L Jacquemin; A Terrier de la Chaise; D Beurrier
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Clinical significance of rapid ventricular tachycardia (> 270 beats per minute) provoked at programmed stimulation in patients without confirmed rapid ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  B Brembilla-Perrot; A Terrier de la Chaise; S Briançon; M Takoordial; C Suty-Selton; B Thiel; J L Brua
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.