INTRODUCTION: In an earlier study, Gatchel et al. (J Occup Rehabil 13:1-9, 2003) demonstrated that participants at high risk for developing chronic low back pain disability (CLBPD), who received a biopsychosocial early intervention treatment program, displayed significantly more symptom improvement, as well as cost savings, relative to participants receiving standard care. The purpose of the present study was to expand on these results by examining whether the addition of a work-transition component would further strengthen the effectiveness of this early intervention treatment. METHODS: Using an existing algorithm, participants were identified as being high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) for developing CLBPD. HR participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: early intervention (EI); early intervention with work transition (EI/WT); or standard care (SC). Participants provided information regarding pain, disability, work status, and psychosocial functioning at baseline, periodically during treatment, and again 1 year following completion of treatment. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, no significant differences were found between the EI and EI/WT groups in terms of occupational status, self-reports of pain and disability, coping ability or psychosocial functioning. However, significant differences in all these outcomes were found comparing these groups to standard care. CONCLUSION: The addition of a work transition component to an early intervention program for the treatment of ALBP did not significantly contribute to improved work outcomes. However, results further support the effectiveness of early intervention for high-risk ALBP patients.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: In an earlier study, Gatchel et al. (J Occup Rehabil 13:1-9, 2003) demonstrated that participants at high risk for developing chronic low back pain disability (CLBPD), who received a biopsychosocial early intervention treatment program, displayed significantly more symptom improvement, as well as cost savings, relative to participants receiving standard care. The purpose of the present study was to expand on these results by examining whether the addition of a work-transition component would further strengthen the effectiveness of this early intervention treatment. METHODS: Using an existing algorithm, participants were identified as being high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) for developing CLBPD. HR participants were then randomly assigned to one of three groups: early intervention (EI); early intervention with work transition (EI/WT); or standard care (SC). Participants provided information regarding pain, disability, work status, and psychosocial functioning at baseline, periodically during treatment, and again 1 year following completion of treatment. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, no significant differences were found between the EI and EI/WT groups in terms of occupational status, self-reports of pain and disability, coping ability or psychosocial functioning. However, significant differences in all these outcomes were found comparing these groups to standard care. CONCLUSION: The addition of a work transition component to an early intervention program for the treatment of ALBP did not significantly contribute to improved work outcomes. However, results further support the effectiveness of early intervention for high-risk ALBPpatients.
Authors: Michael Von Korff; Paul Crane; Michael Lane; Diana L Miglioretti; Greg Simon; Kathleen Saunders; Paul Stang; Nancy Brandenburg; Ronald Kessler Journal: Pain Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Frederieke G Schaafsma; Karyn Whelan; Allard J van der Beek; Ludeke C van der Es-Lambeek; Anneli Ojajärvi; Jos H Verbeek Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-08-30
Authors: M K Nicholas; D S J Costa; S J Linton; C J Main; W S Shaw; G Pearce; M Gleeson; R Z Pinto; F M Blyth; J H McAuley; R J E M Smeets; A McGarity Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2020-03
Authors: Jennifer S Gewandter; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; John T Farrar; Roger B Fillingim; Ian Gilron; John D Markman; Anne Louise Oaklander; Michael J Polydefkis; Srinivasa N Raja; James P Robinson; Clifford J Woolf; Dan Ziegler; Michael A Ashburn; Laurie B Burke; Penney Cowan; Steven Z George; Veeraindar Goli; Ole X Graff; Smriti Iyengar; Gary W Jay; Joel Katz; Henrik Kehlet; Rachel A Kitt; Ernest A Kopecky; Richard Malamut; Michael P McDermott; Pamela Palmer; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; Ilona Steigerwald; Jeffrey Tobias; Gary A Walco Journal: Pain Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: J Rantonen; J Karppinen; A Vehtari; S Luoto; E Viikari-Juntura; M Hupli; A Malmivaara; S Taimela Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 3.295