Literature DB >> 12611026

Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: a one-year prospective study.

Robert J Gatchel1, Peter B Polatin, Carl Noe, Margaret Gardea, Carla Pulliam, Judy Thompson.   

Abstract

In an attempt to prevent acute low-back pain from becoming a chronic disability problem, an earlier study developed a statistical algorithm which accurately identified those acute low-back pain patients who were at high risk for developing such chronicity. The major goal of the present study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of employing an early intervention program with these high-risk patients in order to prevent the development of chronic disability at a 1-year follow-up. Approximately 700 acute low-back pain patients were screened for their high-risk versus low-risk status. On the basis of this screening, high-risk patients were then randomly assigned to one of two groups: a functional restoration early intervention group (n = 22), or a nonintervention group (n = 48). A group of low-risk subjects (n = 54) who did not receive any early intervention was also evaluated. All these subjects were prospectively tracked at 3-month intervals starting from the date of their initial evaluation, culminating in a 12-month follow-up. During these follow-up evaluations, pain disability and socioeconomic outcomes (such as return-to-work and healthcare utilization) were assessed. Results clearly indicated that the high-risk subjects who received early intervention displayed statistically significant fewer indices of chronic pain disability on a wide range of work, healthcare utilization, medication use, and self-report pain variables, relative to the high-risk subjects who do not receive such early intervention. In addition, the high-risk nonintervention group displayed significantly more symptoms of chronic pain disability on these variables relative to the initially low-risk subjects. Cost-comparison savings data were also evaluated. These data revealed that there were greater cost savings associated with the early intervention group versus the no early intervention group. The overall results of this study clearly demonstrate the treatment- and cost-effectiveness of an early intervention program for acute low-back pain patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12611026     DOI: 10.1023/a:1021823505774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  34 in total

1.  Length of disability and cost of workers' compensation low back pain claims.

Authors:  L Hashemi; B S Webster; E A Clancy; E Volinn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  The functional restoration approach to the treatment of chronic pain in patients with soft tissue and back injuries.

Authors:  R I Mitchell; G M Carmen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The dominant role of psychosocial risk factors in the development of chronic low back pain disability.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; P B Polatin; T G Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences.

Authors:  J K Moffett; D Torgerson; S Bell-Syer; D Jackson; H Llewlyn-Phillips; A Farrin; J Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-31

5.  Patterns and determinants of multiple provider use in patients with acute low back pain.

Authors:  V Sundararajan; T R Konrad; J Garrett; T Carey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jan S Skouen; Astrid L Grasdal; Ellen M H Haldorsen; Holger Ursin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  MR imaging as the primary modality for neuroradiologic evaluation of the lumbar spine. Effects on cost and number of examinations.

Authors:  M Annertz; H Wingstrand; B Strömqvist; S Holtås
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  The outcomes and costs of care for acute low back pain among patients seen by primary care practitioners, chiropractors, and orthopedic surgeons. The North Carolina Back Pain Project.

Authors:  T S Carey; J Garrett; A Jackman; C McLaughlin; J Fryer; D R Smucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Low back pain: predictors of absenteeism, residual symptoms, functional impairment, and medical costs in Oregon workers' compensation recipients.

Authors:  P G Butterfield; P S Spencer; N Redmond; A Feldstein; N Perrin
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Predicting outcome of chronic back pain using clinical predictors of psychopathology: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  R J Gatchel; P B Polatin; R K Kinney
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.267

View more
  50 in total

1.  Problematic pain - redefining how we view pain?

Authors:  Chris Barker; Ann Taylor; Martin Johnson
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2014-02

Review 2.  How to assess a new patient for a multidisciplinary chronic pain rehabilitation program: a review article.

Authors:  Adham Malaty; Josephine Sabharwal; Lesley Smallwood Lirette; Gassan Chaiban; Hazem Eissa; Reda Tolba
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain.

Authors:  Frederieke G Schaafsma; Karyn Whelan; Allard J van der Beek; Ludeke C van der Es-Lambeek; Anneli Ojajärvi; Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-30

4.  Predicting return to work after low back injury using the Psychosocial Risk for Occupational Disability Instrument: a validation study.

Authors:  I Z Schultz; J Crook; J Berkowitz; R Milner; G R Meloche
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

Review 5.  Prognosis and the identification of workers risking disability: research issues and directions for future research.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Doug Gross; Izabela Z Schultz; Chris Main; Pierre Côté; Glenn Pransky; William Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

6.  The effects of a graded activity intervention for low back pain in occupational health on sick leave, functional status and pain: 12-month results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hynek Hlobil; J Bart Staal; Jos Twisk; Albere Köke; Geertje Ariëns; Tjabe Smid; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 7.  Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  I A Steenstra; J H Verbeek; M W Heymans; P M Bongers
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 8.  Reducing sickness absence from work due to low back pain: how well do intervention strategies match modifiable risk factors?

Authors:  William S Shaw; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

9.  [Treatment effects and cost-effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain treatment of patients with back pain : A controlled observational intervention study based on claims data and survey data of participants].

Authors:  C J Wagner; G Ayyad; A Otzdorff; K Bienek; U Marnitz; B von Pickardt; W Seidel; S Sehlen; P Supantia; G Lindena
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 10.  A conceptual-practice model for occupational therapy to facilitate return to work in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Huguette A M Désiron; Peter Donceel; Angelique de Rijk; Elke Van Hoof
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.