Literature DB >> 20369093

Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.

Josep Oliva1, Xavi Oliva, Josep D Oliva.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year success rate of zirconia (ZrO2) implants with three different kinds of surfaces.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-piece zirconia dental implants (CeraRoot) with three different roughened surfaces were designed and manufactured for this study: coated, uncoated, and acid-etched. Five different implant designs were manufactured. Standard or flapless surgical procedures were used for implant placement. Simultaneous bone augmentation or sinus elevation was performed when bone height or width was insufficient. Definitive all-ceramic restorations were placed 4 months after implant placement (8 months or more for implants when bone augmentation or sinus elevation was performed). The implants were followed up to 5 years (mean, 3.40 +/- 0.21).
RESULTS: In all, 831 implants were placed in 378 patients with a mean age of 48 years. The overall implant success rate after 5 years of follow-up was 95% (92.77% for uncoated implants, 93.57% for coated implants, and 97.60% for acid-etched implants). The success rate of the acid-etched surface group was significantly better than that of the other two.
CONCLUSION: From this midterm investigation, it can be concluded that zirconia dental implants with roughened surfaces might be a viable alternative for tooth replacement. Further follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term success rates of the implant surfaces studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20369093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

Review 1.  Zirconia surface modifications for implant dentistry.

Authors:  Fernanda H Schünemann; María E Galárraga-Vinueza; Ricardo Magini; Márcio Fredel; Filipe Silva; Júlio C M Souza; Yu Zhang; Bruno Henriques
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 2.  Implants in bone: part I. A current overview about tissue response, surface modifications and future perspectives.

Authors:  Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Tobias Moest; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle; Karl Andreas Schlegel
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02-24

3.  Osseointegration of a novel injection molded 2-piece ceramic dental implant: a study in minipigs.

Authors:  Geninho Thomé; Rebecca Sandgren; Sergio Bernardes; Larissa Trojan; Nils Warfving; Benjamin Bellón; Benjamin E Pippenger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of peri-implant bone formation around injection-molded and machined surface zirconia implants in rabbit tibiae.

Authors:  Hong-Kyun Kim; Kyung Mi Woo; Won-Jun Shon; Jin-Soo Ahn; Seunghee Cha; Young-Seok Park
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Implant Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Using a New Monotype Zirconia Implant-A Case Report.

Authors:  Stefan Roehling; Georges Ghazal; Thomas Borer; Florian Thieringer; Michael Gahlert
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-17

Review 6.  A Critical Review of Dental Implant Materials with an Emphasis on Titanium versus Zirconia.

Authors:  Reham B Osman; Michael V Swain
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  A Special Design to Facilitate Retrieval of Cement-Retained Zirconia-Based Implant-Supported Restorations.

Authors:  Mitra Farzin; Reza Derafshi; Rashin Giti; Masumeh Taghva
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2021-06

8.  Two-piece zirconia implants supporting all-ceramic crowns: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Norbert Cionca; Nada Müller; Andrea Mombelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 9.  A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants.

Authors:  Dena Hashim; Norbert Cionca; Delphine S Courvoisier; Andrea Mombelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth edentulous area: 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kai-Hendrik Bormann; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Heinz Kniha; Sabine Schild; Dieter Weingart; Michael Gahlert
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.