Fernanda H Schünemann1, María E Galárraga-Vinueza1, Ricardo Magini1, Márcio Fredel2, Filipe Silva3, Júlio C M Souza4, Yu Zhang5, Bruno Henriques6. 1. School of Dentistry (DODT), Post-Graduate Program in Dentistry (PPGO), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Trindade, 88040-900 Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. 2. Ceramic and Composite Materials Research Group (CERMAT), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Trindade, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. 3. CMEMS-UMinho, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal. 4. CMEMS-UMinho, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal; Department of Dental Sciences, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, 4585-116, Gandra, Portugal. 5. Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, NYU, New York, NY 10010, USA. 6. Ceramic and Composite Materials Research Group (CERMAT), Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Trindade, 88040-900, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil; CMEMS-UMinho, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal. Electronic address: bruno.henriques@ufsc.br.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zirconia has emerged as a versatile dental material due to its excellent aesthetic outcomes such as color and opacity, unique mechanical properties that can mimic the appearance of natural teeth and decrease peri-implant inflammatory reactions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to critically explore the state of art of zirconia surface treatment to enhance the biological and osseointegration behavior of zirconia in implant dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search in PubMed database was carried out until May 2018 using the following combination of key words and MeSH terms without time periods: "zirconia surface treatment" or "zirconia surface modification" or "zirconia coating" and "osseointegration" or "biological properties" or "bioactivity" or "functionally graded properties". RESULTS: Previous studies have reported the influence of zirconia-based implant surface on the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblast and fibroblasts at the implant to bone interface during the osseointegration process. A large number of physicochemical methods have been used to change the implant surfaces and therefore to improve the early and late bone-to-implant integration, namely: acid etching, gritblasting, laser treatment, UV light, CVD, and PVD. The development of coatings composed of silica, magnesium, graphene, dopamine, and bioactive molecules has been assessed although the development of a functionally graded material for implants has shown encouraging mechanical and biological behavior. CONCLUSION: Modified zirconia surfaces clearly demonstrate faster osseointegration than that on untreated surfaces. However, there is no consensus regarding the surface treatment and consequent morphological aspects of the surfaces to enhance osseointegration.
BACKGROUND:n class="Chemical">Zirconiahas emerged as a versatile dental material due to its excellent aesthetic outcomes such as color and opacity, unique mechanical properties that can mimic the appearance of natural teeth and decrease peri-implant inflammatory reactions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to critically explore the state of art of zirconia surface treatment to enhance the biological and osseointegration behavior of zirconia in implant dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search in PubMed database was carried out until May 2018 using the following combination of key words and MeSH terms without time periods: "zirconia surface treatment" or "zirconia surface modification" or "zirconia coating" and "osseointegration" or "biological properties" or "bioactivity" or "functionally graded properties". RESULTS: Previous studies have reported the influence of zirconia-based implant surface on the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblast and fibroblasts at the implant to bone interface during the osseointegration process. A large number of physicochemical methods have been used to change the implant surfaces and therefore to improve the early and late bone-to-implant integration, namely: acid etching, gritblasting, laser treatment, UV light, CVD, and PVD. The development of coatings composed of silica, magnesium, graphene, dopamine, and bioactive molecules has been assessed although the development of a functionally graded material for implants has shown encouraging mechanical and biological behavior. CONCLUSION: Modified zirconia surfaces clearly demonstrate faster osseointegration than that on untreated surfaces. However, there is no consensus regarding the surface treatment and consequent morphological aspects of the surfaces to enhance osseointegration.
Authors: J H Dubruille; E Viguier; G Le Naour; M T Dubruille; M Auriol; Y Le Charpentier Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Date: 1999 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Ioannis K Karoussis; Giovanni E Salvi; Lisa J A Heitz-Mayfield; Urs Brägger; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Niklaus P Lang Journal: Clin Oral Implants Res Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 5.977
Authors: Welson Cunha; Oscar Carvalho; Bruno Henriques; Filipe S Silva; Mutlu Özcan; Júlio C M Souza Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Fernando Zarone; Maria Irene Di Mauro; Pietro Ausiello; Gennaro Ruggiero; Roberto Sorrentino Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2019-07-04 Impact factor: 2.757