Literature DB >> 20362858

Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length.

Kenneth J Hoffer1, H John Shammas, Giacomo Savini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and keratometric (K) measurements of 2 laser biometers.
SETTING: Private practices, Lynwood and Santa Monica, California, USA.
METHODS: In this prospective comparative observational study of eyes with cataract and eyes with a clear lens, AL, ACD, and K measurements were performed using an IOLMaster biometer, which uses partial coherence interferometry (PCI), and a Lenstar LS 900 biometer, which uses optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR). Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation was performed using the Haigis formula. The IOL prediction error was calculated for each eye.
RESULTS: The study evaluated 50 eyes with cataract and 50 eyes with a clear lens. There was a good correlation between AL, ACD, and K measurements in the cataractous eyes (r = 0.9993, 0.9667, and 0.9959, respectively) and in eyes with a clear lens (r = 0.9995, 0.8211, and 0.9959, respectively). The OLCR unit measured a slightly longer AL in the cataract group and clear lens group (mean difference 0.026 mm and 0.023 mm, respectively), a deeper ACD (0.128 mm and 0.146 mm, respectively), and a flatter K (-0.107 diopter [D] and -0.121 D, respectively). The differences were statistically significant (P<.0001). The mean absolute error in IOL power prediction was 0.455 D +/- 0.32 (SD) with the OLCR unit and 0.461 +/- 0.31 D with the PCI unit (P>.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements were comparable between the OLCR device and the PCI device. A slight decrease (0.050) in the a(0) constant is recommended if the Haigis formula is used. Copyright (c) 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20362858     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Challenges and approaches in modern biometry and IOL calculation.

Authors:  Wolfgang Haigis
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01

4.  Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.

Authors:  S Jasvinder; T F Khang; K K S Sarinder; V P Loo; V Subrayan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Comparison of optical biometry and applanation ultrasound measurements of the axial length of the eye.

Authors:  Fouad R Nakhli
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-06

6.  [Comparison of IOL-Master 500 vs. Lenstar LS900 concerning the calculation of target refraction: A retrospective analysis].

Authors:  M Stattin; C Zehetner; N E Bechrakis; L Speicher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Agreement of keratometric readings measured using rotating Scheimpflug imaging, auto-refractokeratometer, and biograph in eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Meltem Guzin Altınel; Hasim Uslu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  [Comparison of two optical biometric devices for intraocular lens calculation].

Authors:  M-S Uckmann; M Stattin; C Zehetner; S Neururer; L Speicher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Comparison of ocular parameters of two biometric measurement devices in highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiao Guo; Ran You; Shan-Shan Li; Xiu-Fen Yang; Lu Zhao; Fan Zhang; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 10.  Clinically relevant biometry.

Authors:  Afsun Sahin; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.761

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.