Literature DB >> 20362827

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon allograft: an age-dependent outcome evaluation.

F Alan Barber1, Jorge Aziz-Jacobo, Fernando Barrera Oro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of a consecutive series of nonrevision bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in patients aged 40 years or older and patients aged younger than 40 years.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data from consecutive BPTB allograft ACL reconstructions fixed with biodegradable interference screws and performed by a single surgeon were analyzed by use of established outcome measures. Preoperative and postoperative outcome assessments included Cincinnati, Lysholm, and Tegner scores and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) activity scores. Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and KT arthrometer (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) measurements were obtained at a minimum of 24 months after surgery.
RESULTS: In total, 32 patients met the inclusion criteria (21 men and 11 women). The mean follow-up was 35 months (range, 24 to 58 months). Of the patients, 21 were aged younger than 40 years (66%) and 11 were aged 40 years or older (34%). The mean age was 35 years (range, 18 to 55 years). In patients aged younger than 40 years, the mean postoperative Cincinnati score was 82.4 (39.1 preoperatively); Tegner score, 6.2 (3.9 preoperatively); Lysholm score, 89.5 (46.8 preoperatively); and IKDC activity score, 2.7 out of 4 (1.7 preoperatively). Five patients had a positive postoperative Lachman test, but none had a positive pivot-shift test. KT examinations showed a manual maximum difference of less than 3 mm in all but 1 patient (mean, 0.7 mm). In patients aged 40 years or older, the mean postoperative Cincinnati score was 83.8 (44.4 preoperatively); Tegner score, 6.6 (3.9 preoperatively); Lysholm score, 88.8 (50.1 preoperatively); and IKDC activity score, 2.7 out of 4 (2.1 preoperatively). One patient had a positive postoperative Lachman test, but none had a positive pivot-shift test. KT examinations showed a manual maximum difference of less than 3 mm in all but 1 patient (mean, 1.3 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of BPTB allograft ACL reconstructions were not different both subjectively and objectively for patients aged 40 years or older and patients aged younger than 40 years. BPTB allograft ACL reconstruction provides consistent results for patients of all age groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study. Copyright 2010 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20362827     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  15 in total

1.  Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with modified double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Yan Ling Su; Hui Jian Cao; Fei Wang; Da Hai Yu; Zhi Min Zheng; Ying Ze Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Acute ACL reconstruction in patients over 40 years of age.

Authors:  Guido Wierer; Armin Runer; Christian Hoser; Elmar Herbst; Peter Gföller; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Outcomes after ACL reconstruction with focus on older patients: results from The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Kristian Samuelsson; Jón Karlsson; Magnus Forssblad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged fifty years: comparison of hamstring graft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone graft.

Authors:  Johannes Struewer; Ewgeni Ziring; Ludwig Oberkircher; Karl F Schüttler; Turgay Efe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Better 4-year outcomes for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-layer versus single-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts.

Authors:  Yingzhen Niu; Guman Duan; Fei Wang; Shiyu Tang; Yao Li; Jiangfeng Lu; Xu Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Management of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in patients aged 40 years and older.

Authors:  Claudio Legnani; Clara Terzaghi; Enrico Borgo; Alberto Ventura
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-11-11

7.  Return to Baseline Physical Activity After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jeremy J Bergeron; Quentin P Sercia; Justin Drager; Stéphane Pelet; Etienne L Belzile
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 7.010

8.  Cross cultural adaptation and validation of a Spanish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index.

Authors:  Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Charles P Gabel; Paul Bennett
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Results After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 40 Years: How Do They Compare With Younger Patients? A Systematic Review and Comparison With Younger Populations.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Rachel M Frank; Bryan M Saltzman; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  Patellar tendon or hamstring graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in patients aged above 50 years.

Authors:  Tarun Bali; Raghu Nagraj; Malhar N Kumar; Thomas Chandy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.