Literature DB >> 23052125

Arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with modified double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft.

Hui Jun Kang1, Yan Ling Su, Hui Jian Cao, Fei Wang, Da Hai Yu, Zhi Min Zheng, Ying Ze Zhang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of present study was to introduce a modified double-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) allograft for arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction and investigate the clinical outcomes.
METHODS: From 2007 to 2009, a total of 136 patients underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstructions with BPTB allograft. Of which, 66 patients were with double-layer BPTB allograft (Group 1), and 70 patients were with conventional BPTB allograft (Group 2). Clinical outcomes including Lachman and pivot-shift tests, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, and Lysholm and Tegner activity scores were compared between the two groups at a 2-year minimum follow-up.
RESULTS: Forty-six patients in each group were at a two-year minimum follow-up. The mean side-to-side difference on the KT-1000 arthrometer was 1.2 ± 1.2 mm for group 1 and 2.1 ± 1.9 mm for group 2, with significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.017). The knee function was significantly better for group 1 than for group 2, because the mean Lysholm score was 94.2 ± 4.8 points versus 86.6 ± 7.1 points (p = 0.000), and the median Tegner score was 8 (range 5-10) points versus 6 (range 4-10) points (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the KT-1000 arthrometer evaluation and clinical measures, single-bundle ACL reconstruction with double-layer BPTB allograft achieves significantly lesser anterior laxity and better knee function than a single-layer allograft reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23052125     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2235-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  The correlation between anterior-posterior translation and cross-sectional area of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  E S Grood; K A Walz-Hasselfeld; J P Holden; F R Noyes; M S Levy; D L Butler; D W Jackson; D J Drez
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Kazunori Yasuda; Eiji Kondo; Hiroki Ichiyama; Nobuto Kitamura; Yoshie Tanabe; Harukazu Tohyama; Akio Minami
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Mechanical properties of primate vascularized vs. nonvascularized patellar tendon grafts; changes over time.

Authors:  D L Butler; E S Grood; F R Noyes; M L Olmstead; R B Hohn; S P Arnoczky; M G Siegel
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Comparison of perioperative morbidity of anterior cruciate ligament autografts versus allografts.

Authors:  S R Saddemi; A D Frogameni; P J Fenton; J Hartman; W Hartman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  D M Daniel; L L Malcom; G Losse; M L Stone; R Sachs; R Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon graft: a comparative study with 2-year follow-up results of semitendinosus tendon grafts alone or semitendinosus-gracilis tendon grafts.

Authors:  Yasuo Niki; Hideo Matsumoto; Akihiro Hakozaki; Hiroya Kanagawa; Yoshiaki Toyama; Yasunori Suda
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft. A biomechanical study.

Authors:  D E Cooper; X H Deng; A L Burstein; R F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Biomechanics of patellar tendon autograft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the goat: three-year study.

Authors:  G Y Ng; B W Oakes; O W Deacon; I D McLean; D Lampard
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of stability of autografts compared to allografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Chadwick Prodromos; Brian Joyce; Kelvin Shi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 10.  A literature review of autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonathan Marrale; Matthew C Morrissey; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 4.114

View more
  3 in total

1.  Arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with six-strand hamstring tendon allograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft.

Authors:  Chengliang Dai; Fei Wang; Xiaomeng Wang; Ruipeng Wang; Shengjie Wang; Shiyu Tang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Single-bundle modified patellar tendon versus double-bundle tibialis anterior allograft ACL reconstruction: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Hui Jun Kang; Xiao Jing Wang; Chun Juan Wu; Jian Hui Cao; Da Hai Yu; Zhi Min Zheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Better 4-year outcomes for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-layer versus single-layer bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts.

Authors:  Yingzhen Niu; Guman Duan; Fei Wang; Shiyu Tang; Yao Li; Jiangfeng Lu; Xu Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.