Literature DB >> 26897545

Assessments of Voice Use and Voice Quality Among College/University Singing Students Ages 18-24 Through Ambulatory Monitoring With a Full Accelerometer Signal.

Matthew J Schloneger1, Eric J Hunter2.   

Abstract

The multiple social and performance demands placed on college/university singers could put their still-developing voices at risk. Previous ambulatory monitoring studies have analyzed the duration, intensity, and frequency (in Hertz) of voice use among such students. Nevertheless, no studies to date have incorporated the simultaneous acoustic voice quality measures into the acquisition of these measures to allow for direct comparison during the same voicing period. Such data could provide greater insight into how young singers use their voices, as well as identify potential correlations between vocal dose and acoustic changes in voice quality. The purpose of this study was to assess the voice use and the estimated voice quality of college/university singing students (18-24 years old, N = 19). Ambulatory monitoring was conducted over three full, consecutive weekdays measuring voice from an unprocessed accelerometer signal measured at the neck. From this signal, traditional vocal dose metrics such as phonation percentage, dose time, cycle dose, and distance dose were analyzed. Additional acoustic measures included perceived pitch, pitch strength, long-term average spectrum slope, alpha ratio, dB sound pressure level 1-3 kHz, and harmonic-to-noise ratio. Major findings from more than 800 hours of recording indicated that among these students (a) higher vocal doses correlated significantly with greater voice intensity, more vocal clarity and less perturbation; and (b) there were significant differences in some acoustic voice quality metrics between nonsinging, solo singing, and choral singing.
Copyright © 2017 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambulatory voice monitoring; Vocal dose; Vocal pedagogy; Voice quality; Voice use

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26897545      PMCID: PMC4988942          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.12.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  42 in total

1.  Effects of prolonged oral reading on F0, SPL, subglottal pressure and amplitude characteristics of glottal flow waveforms.

Authors:  E Vilkman; E R Lauri; P Alku; E Sala; M Sihvo
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Measurement of vocal doses in speech: experimental procedure and signal processing.

Authors:  Jan G Svec; Peter S Popolo; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.487

3.  Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Jan G Svec; Peter S Popolo
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Automatic pre-segmentation of running speech improves the robustness of several acoustic voice measures.

Authors:  Tom Bäckström; Laura Lehto; Paavo Alku; Erkki Vilkman
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.487

5.  Vocal impact of a prolonged reading task at two intensity levels: objective measurements and subjective self-ratings.

Authors:  Angélique Remacle; Camille Finck; Anne Roche; Dominique Morsomme
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Protocol challenges for on-the-job voice dosimetry of teachers in the United States and Finland.

Authors:  John Nix; Jan G Svec; Anna-Maria Laukkanen; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Effects of vocal loudness variation on spectrum balance as reflected by the alpha measure of long-term-average spectra of speech.

Authors:  Johan Sundberg; Maria Nordenberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Differences in self-rated, perceived, and acoustic voice qualities between high- and low-fatigue groups.

Authors:  Shin-Woong Cho; Chang Shik Yin; Young-Bae Park; Young-Jae Park
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Assessments of Voice Use and Voice Quality Among College/University Singing Students Ages 18-24 Through Ambulatory Monitoring With a Full Accelerometer Signal.

Authors:  Matthew J Schloneger; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Ambulatory monitoring of disordered voices.

Authors:  Robert E Hillman; James T Heaton; Asa Masaki; Steven M Zeitels; Harold A Cheyne
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.

Authors:  Lisa M Kopf; Cristina Jackson-Menaldi; Adam D Rubin; Jean Skeffington; Eric J Hunter; Mark D Skowronski; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Assessments of Voice Use and Voice Quality Among College/University Singing Students Ages 18-24 Through Ambulatory Monitoring With a Full Accelerometer Signal.

Authors:  Matthew J Schloneger; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  The Effect of Vocal Intonation Therapy on Vocal Dysfunction in Patients With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Xiaoying Zhang; Yi-Chuan Song; De-Gang Yang; Hong-Wei Liu; Song-Huai Liu; Xiao-Bing Li; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  A Semiautomated Protocol Towards Quantifying Vocal Effort in Relation to Vocal Performance During a Vocal Loading Task.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Mark L Berardi; Susanna Whitling
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Quantifying Vocal Repertoire Tessituras Through Real-Time Measures.

Authors:  Matthew Schloneger; Eric J Hunter; Lynn Maxfield
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Amount and Characteristics of Speaking and Singing Voice Use in Vocally Healthy Female College Student Singers During a Typical Week.

Authors:  Laura E Toles; Andrew J Ortiz; Katherine L Marks; Daryush D Mehta; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Differences Between Female Singers With Phonotrauma and Vocally Healthy Matched Controls in Singing and Speaking Voice Use During 1 Week of Ambulatory Monitoring.

Authors:  Laura E Toles; Andrew J Ortiz; Katherine L Marks; James A Burns; Tiffiny Hron; Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.408

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.